Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Premier League Asia Trophy/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC).

Premier League Asia Trophy

 * Nominator(s): Bloom6132 (talk) 22:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it has been improved significantly from the original version and now meets all 6 FL criteria. This list is largely modelled after the Emirates Cup, which was promoted almost a year ago. —Bloom6132 (talk) 22:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Support my concerns addressed, nice work. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:26, 5 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Support pending one niggle - in the notes section, you have "The three clubs are selected according to their position in the league table. One of the teams selected achieved the top five, the other team finished in sixth to tenth place, while the final team placed in the 11–15 position" (all three number ranges should be words or numbers. My vote would be to make the last words as well ("eleventh to fifteenth") but not fussed the other way. Otherwise I can't see anything to complain about WRT comprehensiveness or prose. A nice little read. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:13, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, . Fixed the note with your recommended wording. —Bloom6132 (talk) 01:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Comments from Harrias  talk
 * "in another in" is a little clunky – could it just be "again".
 * Fixed. —Bloom6132 (talk) 18:34, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * "was dismal" is not really encyclopaedic language; using "dismal" like this is quite informal.
 * Changed to "underwhelming". —Bloom6132 (talk) 18:34, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

More to follow. Harrias talk 11:31, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The archived version of Ref #4 doesn't work for me. (The original does.)
 * Same for ref #7.
 * And ref #8.
 * And ref #13.
 * And ref #14.
 * And ref #19.
 * And ref #20.
 * And ref #28.
 * And ref #30.
 * And ref #33.
 * And ref #34.
 * And ref #42.
 * And ref #43.
 * Since Wayback has proved to be unreliable in this case, I've archived all the above refs with WebCite. —Bloom6132 (talk) 12:50, 17 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Ref #39 needs to be marked as subscription only, as even through the wayback machine, all I get is a single paragraph, before being redirected to a visitor landing page. Harrias  talk 07:44, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Marked. That's strange because, other than me having to close a notice telling me to disable my ad-blocker, the article works fine for me (a non-subscriber). —Bloom6132 (talk) 12:50, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review; I've addressed all the comments above. Please let me know if there's anything else for me to fix. —Bloom6132 (talk) 21:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Support; all my (minor) concerns have been resolved, and this is a nice piece of work which meets the criteria. Harrias  talk 16:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Quick comment – My only nitpick is the repetition in the lead photo caption: "Chelsea celebrate with the trophy after winning the 2011 Premier League Asia Trophy." I know the name of the event makes it tough, but they're celebrating with the trophy after winning the trophy. Chopping "with the trophy" gets rid of the redundancy while getting the point across. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:23, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I've replaced "celebrate with the trophy" with "celebrate with the tournament cup". Will that be alright?  I can change "tournament" to "competition" if it sounds better. —Bloom6132 (talk) 21:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 21:05, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.