Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Ellmau

Ellmau
Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2013 at 10:17:12 (UTC)
 * Reason:High quality and high EV
 * Articles in which this image appears:Ellmau
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
 * Creator:Bernie Kohl


 * Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 10:17, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment The image was shoved into the External Links section earlier today. Horrendous article location, and not 7-day stable. Cool pic, haven't had time to look at it otherwise. – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 14:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Please check more carefully next time. Tomer T (talk) 15:44, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * And about the location: it seems like the appropriate location for a panorama. Tomer T (talk) 15:45, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Oops, my bad! Poor Sherlock Holmesian technique on my part, I saw you made an edit in the External Links section and didn't check to see what the edit was. I actually was hoping someone would pull a nagualdesign and have that image at the very top :) But anyway, I'm still not a fan of the current placement—however, I'm not using default viewing mode (I'm in Modern or something) and things always look very different. When I get more of a moment—busy today—I'll look at the whole thing more closely. – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 18:08, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Neutral Stitching in sky isn't smooth, and something about the image is bothering me, probably over contrasting. Also, the sheep on the right is so strange looking. Was it photoshopped in or something? Also checked out the article in default viewing mode and it's just weird being at the bottom of the article, but I understand it'd be hard to fit it up anywhere there since the entire article is dominated by the infobox. – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 16:42, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Support. I don't think the stitching is too bad. Certainly I've have worse in some of my panoramas. Detail is only average considering the width and view, but overall a satisfying panorama. &#208;iliff    &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  13:45, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Support Think it's quite good, maybe a smidgen saturated. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:04, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Reluctant oppose As the other reviewers have noted, it is a quality image. I think the EV suffers here though given its placement in the article and relatively little pertinent discussion to the image. Cowtowner (talk) 17:29, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I changed the placement in the article. Tomer T (talk) 10:28, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
 * That'll do. Support Cowtowner (talk) 03:36, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak support Placement in article much better. My issues above are probably uncorrectable by this point and it is a nice image. – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 16:21, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Support I think it meets the criteria. JJ Harrison (talk) 09:56, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 10:29, 23 June 2013 (UTC)