Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Italian wall lizard

Italian wall lizard
Voting period ends on 24 Jan 2011 at 12:25:29 (UTC)
 * Reason:Very good angle on the whole body of an attractive lizard, tail intact. Resolution is high, lighting is nice, and it's an FP on de.wiki.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Italian wall lizard
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
 * Creator:Richard Bartz


 * Support as nominator -- Mae din\ talk 12:25, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I like the original more, but will officially prefer edit 1 because it's more likely to succeed at staying in the article (particularly infobox).  Mae din\ talk 13:19, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Support nice perspective. Nergaal (talk) 18:24, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Support. --KFP (contact | edits) 21:43, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose This should be cropped tighter. Then I would support. Greg L (talk) 23:52, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Added crop.  Mae din\ talk 01:01, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Edit 1 is a good photograph, illustrating the subject well in its native habitat. Greg L (talk) 20:32, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1. Nice look. Twilight chill  t   21:00, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Support either. J Milburn (talk) 22:58, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Support I like the original more, as it gives a better sense of size, but will support either. SMasters (talk) 09:02, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for supporting either. If the objective was to sacrifice detail to illustrate diminutive scale, our Ant article would have pictures like this. Wisely, they used a serious closeup of an ant for the introductory photo in the lede of the article. Greg L (talk) 01:05, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 'Support Edit 1. Neutralitytalk 22:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Support edit-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 11:05, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Edit 1. Per above. Nautica Shad es  13:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 09:33, 24 January 2011 (UTC)