Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/JD Vance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

JD Vance[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2023 at 23:16:20 (UTC)

Original – Official Senate Portrait of JD Vance
Reason
This I believe is the highest quality image of a US government official. You can literally see the pores on his nose, go and take a look.
Articles in which this image appears
J. D. Vance
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator
United States Congress; uploaded by Politicsfan4
  • Support as nominatorStanheDog (talk) 23:16, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Another stodgy official govt. pic. Scant EV. (Who wants to see the pores on his nose?) – Sca (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    What does scant ev mean? StanheDog (talk) 05:44, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Not enough encyclopedic value Wow (talk) 07:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Arguably better than most. I'd probably go with Weak support. But you are right - every U.S. Senator and Representative in the last 15 years has a photo in this rough composition. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.6% of all FPs. 05:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support --Wow (talk) 07:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - as Adam noted, there are hundreds of such portraits, so it's not unique, not especially interesting, and does not have high EV. Artem.G (talk) 14:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – There are too many U.S. politicians with high quality government issued portraits. There has to be a compelling reason to nominate (or support) such a photo. I don't see it here. Bammesk (talk) 16:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 01:12, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]