Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Lophophanes cristatus

Crested Tit

 * Reason:details, natural light, natural environment
 * Articles this image appears in:Crested_Tit
 * Creator:Luc Viatour (talk)


 * Support as nominator --Luc Viatour (talk) 15:47, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - A bit small, but good Ev. ₪ Ceran →(cheer→chime →carol) 16:15, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * sorry, I have to correct and send a larger version! --Luc Viatour (talk) 16:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments - this image is in a gallery, and I much rather prefer the image in the infobox of the article. Whichever image passes, it should be the head image for the article. Intothewoods29 (talk) 22:38, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Somewhat soft, and it has blown highlights on the neck.--ragesoss (talk) 01:30, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - a good shot but it's agallery image that adds little value to the article because a similar but superior - in terms of encyclopaedic value - image which shows a greater proportion of the bird (tail, wing, legs) is used in the main body of the article (Lophophanes cristatus Luc Viatour 4.jpg). Guest9999 (talk) 05:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Except the auto-iso seems to have killed that one. :( Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 02:06, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree that it's not feature picture quality but in terms of an encyclopaedic illustration of the bird it is superior to the image nominated. Guest9999 (talk) 03:28, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 16:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Oppose Missing tail, and quality is good but not great. Fletcher (talk) 00:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

. --John254 00:34, 9 January 2009 (UTC)