Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Mount Cleveland

Mount Cleveland Erupts

 * Reason:A striking image of Mount Cleveland erupting in May 2006. This image has incredible detail, and the selection of FPs for geological objects are lacking.
 * Articles this image appears in:Volcano, Volcanic ash, Mount Cleveland (Alaska), Chuginadak Island
 * Creator:Jeffrey Williams

Support any, preference to Alt 2; OPPOSE Alt 3. Very cool pic. Would love it if we could find a larger resolution. We did! Go us! Edit-Alt 4 is just a crop of the original, as far as I can tell. At any rate, it is too small, and cuts off part of the ash cloud. Clegs (talk) 06:35, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support as nominator  Meld    shal   15:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak support - striking, but shame about the small size. Can forgive the out-of-focus ash, of course. One striking aspect is how the clouds (fog?) seem to have been blown away from the eruption. --Golbez (talk) 23:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support High EV. Within the size requirement; could be delisted and replaced if a higher resolution version becomes available.  Durova Charge! 01:52, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I found it! I found it.... The high res image from NASA was downscaled quite a bit due to a very soft focus the original had. Here's the image if anyone is willing to take a hand to it. Not sure you can extract much more detail than the candidate already has... BTW I like the 5th picture down... anyone know if it's already on commons? victorrocha (talk) 06:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - I just uploaded the new version victorrocha mentioned:Image:Mount cleveland erupting2.jpg. -- Meld    shal   11:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Would it be possible to crop out the ID number/white line across the bottom? Clegs (talk) 13:24, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I added this picture to the article about the island Mt. Cleveland is on. Clegs (talk) 13:40, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I guess you could crop it, but I can't do it, i'll screw up the entire image. -- Meld    shal   14:24, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * But i really don't want the larger image to be promoted, it is lower quality by a noticeable amount. -- Meld    shal   14:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

--jjron (talk) 13:03, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Just using automatic white balance correction gives the dark blue background and leads to better contrast in the image imo. Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 19:36, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Original It meets the minumum size requirement, though barely, and has a significant wow advantage over the alternatives. The contrast makes it. --Uncle Bungle (talk) 00:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Original per Uncle Bungle. Very dramatic photo. --Pete Tillman (talk) 03:29, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Original Intothewoods29 (talk) 04:27, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support any --Mbz1 (talk) 21:08, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support original. I don't know why I didn't think of nominating this when I uploaded it in the first place.  howcheng  {chat} 22:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support original Nick Dowling (talk) 08:48, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support original. Quite interesting that scientists didn't notice this.  Spencer T♦C 00:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)