Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Peter Ustinov

Peter Ustinov
Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2010 at 19:13:06 (UTC)
 * Reason:High quality portrait
 * Articles in which this image appears:Peter Ustinov, 2004
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
 * Creator:Allan Warren


 * Support as nominator --Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:13, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose The lighting appears to be a bare strobe attached to the camera just to its right (rotated camera). Such harsh point source-like lighting is as far from high-quality lighting as one can get. The picture is too dark. The color is too saturated. Although Peter Ustinov is a very interesting person, the exceedingly poor quality of the picture is insufficient to evoke the “stop, stare & click” reaction to Featured Pictures we would hope to see out of our I.P. readership. Greg L (talk) 19:35, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Greg L is correct about the positioning, but I'd disagree with the assessment that its a point source, the penumbrae indicate something softer. The total effect feels a bit like a ring light to me. Noodle snacks (talk) 08:28, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support. Looks pretty good to me. It's also worth noting that the subject is dead, making this very much irreplaceable. J Milburn (talk) 14:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support. I don't see much room for criticism. Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 14:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support. This is a very good portrait.  The lighting is slightly eccentric, but we can clearly see the intent of the photographer, to highlight the subject while still showing the surrounding, homelike environment.  Chick Bowen 15:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Greg might be right about the colour, but unorthodox lighting isn't necessarily bad. Noodle snacks (talk) 04:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support As I scrolled down this one caught my eye.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:37, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

-- Jujutacular  talk 19:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)