Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Prague astronomical clock face

Prague astronomical clock face
Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2013  at 19:44:44 (UTC)
 * Reason:High EV, high quality
 * Articles in which this image appears:Astronomical clock, Prague astronomical clock – Zodiacal ring, Jan Šindel (all image replacement with higher quality/resolution)
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Space/Understanding
 * Creator:Godot13


 * Support as nominator --Godot13 (talk) 19:44, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - Shadows are a little harsh, and what's with the webbing over the decorations? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:11, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Probably to keep the pigeons off, I would think. 81.159.107.100 (talk) 11:52, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If it is, that's a shame. Besides, the webbing wouldn't keep the crap away, and would likely make cleaning the decorations more difficult. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I also think it is to keep birds off the figures. I thought about trying to remove the shadow of the netting from the clock face, but realized it requires significantly more editing skill than I actually have. Should I work in the shadows on the sides of the face?-Godot13 (talk) 19:58, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I am strongly opposed to any alteration of the content of supposedly factual photographs, even removal of shadows. In my opinion such doctored photographs have no place in Wikipedia, let alone as featured pictures. 81.159.107.100 (talk) 02:31, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree with 81 about the removing of shadows in this case. Now, as to what amount of editing is allowed, you'll find me decidedly anti-"no Photoshop ever" — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:50, 29 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm putting up two alternatives with different lighting from different times of the day. These images have been cropped, and the perspective has been corrected, but nothing has been done to shadows-Godot13 (talk) 23:32, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I think ALT1 has some potential, although it is a little overexposed (not by much though!) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:19, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Support original alt 1 has focus problems and the original is larger than alt 2. The original is good enough IMO. --Pine✉ 06:24, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Support Original Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:30, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Support Original J Kadavoor J e e 06:13, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Support Original :-  Bellus Delphina     talk   16:45, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 19:59, 7 October 2013 (UTC)