Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Size of planets and stars

Size of planets and stars

 * Reason:It's a mind-blowing sequence. The viewer is invited to reflect on stars so large their size strains the limits of comprehension. It's a high resolution, accurate and thought-provoking image - certainly a worthy candidate.
 * Articles this image appears in:Star, Orders_of_magnitude_(length)
 * Creator:Dave Jarvis


 * Support as nominator --StevenJohnston (talk) 14:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm glad the projections have been fixed since this, but what's going on with the small earth (in section 2)? It looks oblong. ~  ωαdεstεr 16  «talkstalk» 18:52, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Antares (in section 5) seems to be pixelated along it's left edge. Rambo's Revenge (talk)  19:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment While this image is most effective in that it illustrates huge numbers to the human mind, would it be possible to add some sort of unit for scale, perhaps megameters, solar radii, or astronomical units? Also, picture peer review brought up a request for documentation of sizes that I have not seen fulfilled. (Although that doesn't mean those numbers were used in the image...can we trust him?)--HereToHelp (talk to me) 01:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Support pending verification and referencing of data used to construct the image - assuming it's all true, this is an incredible valuable image to illustrate the sheer size of objects in the Universe. People think Earth is big, then Jupiter is quite a bit bigger, then the Sun's a bit bigger than that - but when you realise the Sun would be about 2 pixels square in the last image the mind boggles. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 12:19, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support few issues raised, but its still mind blowing. Noodle snacks (talk) 08:03, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - makes you feel really, really small - Peripitus (Talk) 04:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support. "Space is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly hugely mind-bogglingly big it is." - Douglas Adams. Conditional on size information being available with the image, preferably in description. Mostlyharmless (talk) 23:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Image Data (obtained from NASA and Wikipedia):


 * Comment - I don't see the point of the "table" that all the objects are resting on. Also, Antares has a pixelation problem as mentioned by Rambo's Revenge. Kaldari (talk) 18:53, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Fixed Antares texture map seam (the "pixelated" problem) in sections (5) and (6). Fixed spherical mapping for Earth, Saturn, Neptune, and Jupiter in section (2). Thanks for pointing these out! Changed tilt for Jupiter to reflect reality. The table provides context for positional depth (a visual plane for level); without the table, it would be difficult to discern how the spheres are aligned along the horizontal. The shadows also help with visual alignment. Thangalin (talk) 20:12, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Being one of the main editors involved in WP:SOLARSYSTEM (and also all of space), I think this is very, very, encyclopedic. Like it better than the planet sizes pic, actually.  Ceran  thor 01:34, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - A remarkable image; it serves as a dramatic and accessible showcase of the differing scales of objects in our universe, even before we approach the galactic scale. Furthermore, most of the comments previously raised seem to have been addressed. Duminda Dahanayake (talk) 00:11, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

-- Spencer T♦C 02:24, 25 February 2009 (UTC)