Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Soyuz TMA spacecraft

Soyuz Spacecraft

 * Reason:High resolution, encyclopedic, good contrast and details, current lack of anything non American in the Aeronautics and aviation section.
 * Articles this image appears in:Soyuz spacecraft
 * Creator:Expedition 12/NASA


 * Support as nominator &mdash; Chris H 17:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The pictured looked underexposed, but since I have never been in space, I have no clue how it really is supposed to look. I adjusted the curves to brighten the background and darker portions of the Soyuz without blowing the whites. I also performed noise reduction and unsharp masking as well as downsampling it just enough to get rid of blur while retaining most of the details. J     Are you green? 20:07, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks that does look better.Chris H 02:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I have to say, I'm flattered. This marks the first time I've gotten any "supports", even if they are for an edit. I'm happy to have helped. J     Are you green? 16:43, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1 I was going to weakly support the original…but the edit is by far superior, and I can get fully behind it. Great editing!--HereToHelp 21:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment Your caption is a tad long. Try to be more succint. -- Sturgeonman 21:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey now - extended captions are a courtesy to the wikipedians who manage PotD, and should be encouraged. Debivort 01:46, 4 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Support edit 1 a few blown highlights is better than contrastless blob. -Fcb981 02:39, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1 Much clearer and sharper now. Encyclopedic and unique. It almost looks fake...like a miniature hanging in front of a pic of the earth (probably due to the intense light from the sun)! Well, I guess it gives it a surreal feel to it. ;)  Jumping cheese   Cont @ct 12:35, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support edit1 - Enc and beautiful. Alvesgaspar 11:17, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support edit1--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:36, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support edit1 Nice! Less darker! ♠  Tom   @  s   Bat   19:50, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support edit1 Great adjustment, J! --Gabycs 16:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The original is too fuzzy in places, but the lightening of edit one makes it look overexposed. - Mgm|(talk) 12:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

--Debivort 01:31, 13 May 2007 (UTC)