Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Three Views of Taman Sari

Three Views of Taman Sari
Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2014  at 01:26:56 (UTC)


 * Reason:All are high resolution and good quality. All show a different part of the "water castle" with great detail, and all are well used in the article. Also, all have specific discussion of them in the article.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Taman Sari (Yogyakarta)
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
 * Creator:Chris Woodrich


 * Support as nominator – — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Support – I like those pictures, they are well balaced, good composition, nice harmonizing colours, a good set of pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hafspajen (talk • contribs) 11:41, 23 May 2014‎
 * Support - Solid images resulting from some very hard work.--Godot13 (talk) 19:30, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Not something that would make me oppose, but the middle image has some blue/purple CA at the uppermost central part of the structure...-Godot13 (talk) 19:34, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Since this passed QI, I think Commons policy is against overwriting it. For something that minor I don't think it's a good idea to upload separately. I'll do it, though, if necessary. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:48, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Commons has no policy on overwriting QI or FP. It has a guideline which previously gave some silly advice, but no longer does. Feel absolutely free to correct any CA in your own images. -- Colin°Talk 21:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Alright, a guideline. Thanks for pointing out the change, Colin. Will try and fix the CA soon — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Colin, Godot13, I believe I have addressed this. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Support Nice lighting. Good to see quality images added to a GA article. In the third image that info panel is a terrible eyesore for no good reason as it conveys little useful info. They really should have placed it at least a bit lower so it doesn't obscure the diagonal line behind it, but is not the photographer's fault. -- ELEKHHT 07:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
 * For some reason they have a habit of doing that to historical buildings, Candi Asu, for instance (example). Some are not as bothersome; that at Candi Sewu (example) can be ignored as the site is much bigger and offers more angles. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Support Couldn't review this at full resolution - the Commons Large Image Viewer actually doesn't handle things this large - so I viewed a thumbnail still well over the minimum resolution. If that was a native size, I'd support it, so I'm happy to support the much better image it really is. Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 01:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC) --Armbrust The Homunculus 01:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC) --Armbrust The Homunculus 01:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC)