Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Water pollution

Water pollution
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2012 at 18:15:01 (UTC)
 * Reason:Good EV and quality
 * Articles in which this image appears:Water pollution, Lake Maracaibo
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Other
 * Creator:Wilfredor


 * Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 18:15, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * And Support alt. Tomer T (talk) 17:10, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose original The image quality is there, but I dislike the composition. I would expect an image featuring water pollution to give slightly more context to the debris. Jujutacular (talk) 21:05, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I added an alternative. Is that what you mean by more context? Tomer T (talk) 08:05, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * That is better, although it still doesn't seem quite there for me. I can't really put my finger on what would make it better though, so I abstain on the alt. Jujutacular (talk) 14:31, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Support High quality and much EV.Alborzagros (talk) 13:33, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose agree with Jujutacular that more context would add to the EV. Pine✉ 05:15, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Support alt Jkadavoor (talk) 15:57, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Support alt: it could provide more context that that, but that would be a fundamentally different picture: the two could co-exist. This one tells us quite a lot about the nature and volume of water pollution on Lake Maracaibo, which, given what it shows must be a central part of an article on the lake. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 14:17, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Support Alt better context, though more would be even better. Focus is slightly off. -- WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  19:53, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose: The view feels too arbitrary in both.  Would be improved with a wider angle of view or a larger panorama, catching more of the shoreline, a longer length of debris, and the bank, so that it's a composition instead of a snapshot.  Julia\talk  19:24, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 00:13, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Not enough support. Makeemlighter (talk) 00:13, 1 October 2012 (UTC)