Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Raindrops off the Golden Gate

Raindrops off the Golden Gate Vridge

 * Reason: Many users and readers complained about the resolution of the image. I took another one that is of a higher resolution and better composition IMO. It has both North and South Towers of the Bridge shown. The quality is of course not so great, but I hope a litlle bit better than in original one.If somebody is willing to work on the original to make it look better, I'll upload one. Thanks.
 * Previous nomination/s:Featured picture candidates/Raindrops off the Golden Gate Bridge
 * Nominator: Mbz1 (talk)


 * Delist and replace &mdash; Mbz1 (talk) 04:13, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delist and replace ~  ωαdεstεr 16  «talkstalk» 04:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The original shows the reflection better in thumbnails. --Muhammad (talk) 05:42, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * True, though the proposed replacement could be cropped to gain the same effect. ~  ωαdεstεr 16  «talkstalk» 15:04, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delist and replace New version is much higher quality and the lens effect stands out more because it's sharper. .froth. (talk) 04:09, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Second thumbnail has zero impact compared to first. --KP Botany (talk) 17:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delist Logically, if the first one is not good enough on technical grounds, and the second one is not good enough on aesthetic or EV grounds, then the answer is to just delist. Stevage 14:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The big droplet in the current FP gives it superior EV in my eyes. I don't think the quality is low enough to warrant delisting. Makeemlighter (talk) 21:28, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

MER-C 07:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)