Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Condom/1

Condom

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Condom/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Delisted. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  20:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Unsourced material (criterion 2), and an abundance of WP:WTW (criterion 1b). Also, quality of prose is poor (lots of one-line paragraphs), and the history section is pretty much reliant on one source (possibly violating criterion 4). I should note that I think the medicine WikiProject perfectly capable of overcoming these issues, should they wish to. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:50, 14 April 2023 (UTC)