Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Edward Norton/1

Edward Norton

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Edward_Norton/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Kept . Although concerns were listed by the GAR nominator there appears to be little wrong with the article, and it seems to meet the criteria. The nominator has not responded with any detail about problems and the discussion has run its course. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:58, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

This article has multiple issues, i am listing some : So i want a through revision and review of the article. Bineet Ojha |BINEET| 14:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Many unsourced materials (or inferring from the source, instead of directly quoting and stating the material) throughout the article.
 * Not enough coverage of the career as per WP:Bio.
 * Many language flaws.
 * Presentation style not per GA standards.
 * To be honest I am not seeing a lot wrong with this article. Fixed one citation needed tag, but everything else appears sourced. Career coverage is good, don't know what language flaws is referring to and the presentation style is fine. Unless something else is brought up I say Keep this as a Good article. I notified the only active major contributor and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers for you. AIR corn  (talk) 05:46, 8 March 2012 (UTC)