Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Holden Commodore/1

Holden Commodore

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Holden_Commodore/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • GAN review not found
 * Result: Delisted. &#126;~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:34, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

This 2007 listing contains significant uncited material near the start and end of the body, meaning it does not meet GA criterion 2b); it is also overloaded by images (and tagged accordingly) but that is not part of the GA criteria. &#126;~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I think that the article is quite sufficient and don't think it should be removed, but hey, I might be wrong.
 * Cheers, Arotparaarms (talk) 22:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Well it should be. Many, many dead/unreliable links. The History section is nearly entirely unsourced. However, I did notice that the generation sections (eg #VS (1995–1997)) were nearly fully sourced (however, are the sources reliable? No. Arotparaarms, could you read the GA criteria please? I realised you randomly listed Chevrolet Volt (first generation) as a GA when I nominated it without even taking a look. Please take some time. 750h+ (talk) 00:45, 15 February 2024 (UTC)