Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/IPad/1

iPad

 * Result: kept
 * Result: kept

I am requesting a reassessment of iPad. The iPad article is good but I think that a reassesement is necessary. Awsome EBE123  talkContribs 19:42, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Why this page and Talk:IPad/GA2? Pick one, please; I don't care which, although there's probably a convention to follow. HereToHelp (talk to me) 20:34, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I've closed the other discussion as this page is where it should be. -- Eraserhead1 &lt;talk&gt; 08:33, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I think there should be some mention of the lack of Flash support so the coverage is broad. -- Eraserhead1 &lt;talk&gt; 10:08, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I've added some content on the lack of Flash support - I now have no issues with it. -- Eraserhead1 &lt;talk&gt; 22:36, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I can't see much if anything wrong with it, I don't particularly like the style of the prose in some parts but that's fairly minor, so I'm second guessing the issues I should be looking at. It would be better if you mentioned what you think has changed for the worse? Szzuk (talk) 19:32, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Can someone close this discussion as no really substantial issues have been raised? -- Eraserhead1 &lt;talk&gt; 22:36, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, closed as kept. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC)