Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Power: A New Social Analysis/1

Power: A New Social Analysis

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Power:_A_New_Social_Analysis/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • GAN review not found
 * Result: Delisted. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:52, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Not only does this 2007 listing use the deprecated WP:PAREN citation style, which can be fixed pretty easily, but it contains excessive detail (7,000+ words) on "The Content" of the work, and not enough detail on its background, reception, and legacy. Thus, GA criteria 2b) and 3b) are not met. [[User:AirshipJungleman29| AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Delist: Besides the points being raised so far, the great majority of the article relies exclusively on the book itself as a primary source. This is problematic for a work on philosophy that requires interpretation to make sense of things. Phlsph7 (talk) 09:03, 22 December 2023 (UTC)