Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Thom Darden/1

Thom Darden

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Thom_Darden/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Kept. &#126;~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

This passed as a GA in 2009, and it definitely does not meet the standards of a 2024 GA. In fact, I'm not sure if it should have passed in 2009 either. The pro section is sorely lacking for someone that had a 10-year career, and reads rather disjointed as written even if the prose was long enough. Wizardman 15:32, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I do see some expansion was done so I'll make some time and look to see if it was sufficient. Wizardman  22:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Did you have a look ? &#126;~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * It's better now so I guess it'll suffice. Wizardman  13:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Are you going to close this?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Not sure how to do closures so I'll let Airship handle it. Wizardman  20:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)