Wikipedia:Peer review/Adobe Flash/archive1

Adobe Flash

 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I think it needs general review.

Thanks, Kozuch (talk) 12:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

This is quite some way from GA right now, I'd suggest a thorough set of references are added and that the entire article be copyedited. Try the league of copyeditors... All the best, The Rambling Man (talk) 16:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments from
 * Check the use of hyphens per WP:DASH.
 * Ensure all citations, where appropriate, use cite web and contain as much information as possible.
 * For an article this size, I would expect considerably more than 28 citations (e.g. second para of History is citation-less)
 * Resolve the merge tag.
 * Write the Player section as prose, not bullet points.
 * Same with authoring tool.
 * And both sections need references for their various claims.
 * "which wants to drive rich Internet experiences and create a consistent application interface across" reads like an advert to me.
 * " Some developers reported the actual licences missing from the project documentation, but Adobe stated to address the issue." - actual is redundant, and should it be "started"?
 * Programming language section is reference-less and needs to be worked on for prose - it's currently like bullet points without the bullets.
 * "Since The Arrival of the..." - whoa, over caps...
 * Deal with the citation needed template.
 * Avoid in-line linking.