Wikipedia:Peer review/GoldenEye/archive2

GoldenEye
Previously reviewed. Currently, the article is listed as a Good Article and is A-Class for the Films WikiProject. Furthermore, it seems to be a good article and I would like to see if become featured. I'd like to know what can be done to make that happen. Thanks, Cbrown1023 23:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment The gadgets and weapons sections come across as real fancrufty - what's their significance? LuciferMorgan 02:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * As a third-party member who has not contributed at all to this article, I have deduced that it is there because they are a major part of the film (it is an action movie... the cars/gadgets/guns are important). Cbrown1023 02:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

It's a Bond movie, all the articles have them. Wiki-newbie 15:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's one of the main things about Bond films - they rarely have any deeper meanings. I think it would be a mistake not to mention them at all. Trebor 19:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 22:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Text:

GoldenEye
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.
 * Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
 * Per Wikipedia:Context and Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link.
 * Per Manual of Style (headings), avoid using special characters (ex: &+{}[]) in headings.
 * There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
 * Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
 * Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “ All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.