Wikipedia:Peer review/Mauna Loa/archive1

Mauna Loa
I've just recently expanded this a lot. I'd like it to be an FA; the largest volcano on the planet surely deserved a featured article. I realise this article is only partly referenced at the moment, but apart from that I'm looking for thoughts on whether it covers everything it should, and what else is needed. Any input much appreciated. Worldtraveller 15:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program. They may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). If the following suggestions are completely incorrect about the article, please drop a note on my talk page.


 * Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, months and days of the week generally should not be linked (Don't link September or Tuesday unless there is really good reason to). Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.


 * Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space -  between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18&amp;nbsp;mm.


 * Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links.


 * There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.


 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a.
 * You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas.
 * Thanks, Andy t 22:41, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow, I had no idea peer review was automated these days! The MOS concerns I will address; the weasel word detector was apparently fooled by 'it has been designated'; citations, as I say, I will add shortly; and copediting, maybe someone here would like to help with.  Suppose you can't write a javascript thing to suggest which sections need more info?  :)  Worldtraveller 22:47, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * You'll have to thank RN for the idea. Hmmm... discovering which sections need more information... sounds intriguing... Andy t 23:19, 14 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Overlinking of dates in this article can be fixed quickly with another tool: simply copy the entire contents of User:Bobblewik/monobook.js to your own monobook. Then follow the instructions in your monobook to clear the cache (i.e. press Ctrl-Shift-R in Firefox, or Ctrl-F5 in IE) before it will work. This will give you a 'Dates' tab in edit mode. Hope that helps. bobblewik 18:46, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I've made the MOS-related changes now. I'm away for the next two weeks, so perhaps should have waited until I got back before requesting review; but if anyone has any comments I'll look forward to addressing them when I return.  Worldtraveller 19:53, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * There are still excessive links to solitary years. Feel free to use the monobook tool described above. bobblewik 13:37, 17 June 2006 (UTC)