Wikipedia:Peer review/Microsoft Office/archive1

Microsoft Office

 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I think it needs general review.

Thanks, Kozuch (talk) 12:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments from «  Milk's Favorite Cøøkie  (  talk  /  contribs )
 * Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
 * Per Wikipedia:Context and Build the web, years with full dates should be linked.
 * As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark.
 * The prose tag, well, make the article satisy the manual of style and remove the tag.
 * Filled with fact templates. Add references and remove them.
 * I would recommend using (although not required) citeweb, citenews etc. for the references.
 * The expand tags - expand the sections.
 * That's all for now... «  Milk's Favorite Cøøkie  (  talk  /  contribs ) 22:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC)