Wikipedia:Peer review/Nintendo/archive1

Nintendo
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because it's almost to good article in my opinion, but there are a few minor problems in the article that I would like to get an opinion on.

Thanks, Nathan2055talk 14:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

It's nowhere near in becoming a good article: So there's a lot of work needed to be done-SCB &#39;92 (talk) 16:24, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * "New ventures" subsection has paragraphs with no citations
 * "Electronic era" subsection has a paragraph with no citations
 * "Handheld console history" subsection has a paragraph with no citations
 * there's a {citation needed} template in the "Offices and locations", "Emulation", and "License guidelines" subsections
 * the "Emulation" subsection has a template identifying issues where:
 * It needs additional citations for verification.
 * It may contain original research.
 * It may contain previously unpublished synthesis of published material that conveys ideas not attributable to the original sources.
 * There are also many one-sentence paragraphs throughout the article that should be merged with the previous or next paragraph.