Wikipedia:Peer review/The Godfather/archive3

The Godfather
I've listed this article for peer review because… it is one of the greatest films of all time and I would like to see this article obtain Good Article status. I've been editing the majority of the article for the past years or so. At this point I do not know what else I need to the article, but I'm combing through books right now to make sure I'm not missing anything critical.
 * Previous peer review

I'm also looking at advice for the cinematic influence section. I do not really know how to tackle it. I've posted on the talk page of the godfather with my idea for the section, but I have yet to receive any real feedback. My idea is to scrap the "In film" and "In television" sections as they really don't hold much value and seem like something IMDb would have, and is overly trivial. In addition, more and more examples will be continued to be added to these sections as the years go by and more forms of media imitate the film, making it even more unnecessary.

Any and all comments are welcome! Thanks ahead of time! I do know some refs are out of order, but I'm planning on fixing that once I've removed more sources and whatnot. Disc Wheel ( T  +  C )  18:13, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments by Emir of Wikipedia
Can you please clarify how this image is in the public domain? It appears to be copyrighted by The Basic Training of Pavlo Hummel.

Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 22:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I think this is an important issue, could you please reply? Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:25, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Lead
The first paragraph of the lead looks good. It states the genre, director, producer, and source material clearly. Furthermore a brief plot is given. The second paragraph doesn't seem as good. It starts by discussing pre-production aspects, and then randomly jumps to the composer. The third paragraph seems to be better, but perhaps the final sentence could be moved to the end of the next paragraph. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:21, 23 September 2016 (UTC)