Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Ores

Elements, Minerals and Ores
I like all of these and think they could make FP and all of them are either featured on Commons or a different language Wiki, but I'm not sure, does anyone think they might have artefacts or that the edges against the background might be too harsh to pass?


 * Articles this image appears in:Can we just say "a lot"?


 * Creator:Digon3


 * Suggested by: I'ḏ  ♥  One  18:33, 7 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments:
 * Copper We have File:Cu-Scheibe.JPG as a FP for Copper, which is an Element and the image is not used on the element's page. That rules it out. — raeky  T  03:21, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Amethyst Not used on Amethyst and we have File:Amethyst. Magaliesburg, South Africa.jpg as our FP for Amethyst, again, image not used on it or Quartz which has this FP File:Quartz, Tibet.jpg. So we could probably rule that one out too. — raeky  T  03:21, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Albite Image appears to be quite heavily digitally manipulated, some pretty obvious cutout artifacts along the bottom and reflection is probably fake, also the sample isn't really that impressive, so I think that would probably fail too. — raeky  T  03:21, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Aragonite Not used on Aragonite or anywhere else, and we seem to have some pretty good images on Aragonite already.. so thats probably ruled out. — raeky  T  03:21, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Pyrite Not used on Pyrite or anywhere else really, and we have an excellent FP of Pyrite already, File:Pyrite from Ampliación a Victoria Mine, Navajún, La Rioja, Spain 2.jpg, as you can see the sample isn't that impressive compared to the one in our existing FP. — raeky  T  03:21, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Seconder:

