Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 February 12



Template:Roberts Broadcasting

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Roberts Broadcasting

After selling stations to Ion and TBN, Roberts now only own one radio station. So a template is no longer needed. jcn John Chen  (Talk-Contib.) RA 23:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Csworldwide1 (talk) 05:39, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 12:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator....William 18:57, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:StarCraft Timeline

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete after substitution. Feel free to delete it if the information is not appropriate. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 01:20, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * StarCraft Timeline

Template used in only one article.

Plan shortly to pull it in as a wikitable in the article affected. Izno (talk) 17:30, 12 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Even if it were used slightly more often, this is already adequately covered in Blizzard Entertainment. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 17:36, 12 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Support the need for making a template dedicated for it is unnecessary.Lucia Black (talk) 18:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete and remove from article because it conveys no information that cannot be better presented in prose. I'd accept the alternative to subst then delete as appropriate if it comes down to that. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  21:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Subst, delete, let local editors keep, change, or remove it as necessary. Axem Titanium (talk) 19:02, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Extremely Dangerous

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was userfy Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 01:17, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Extremely Dangerous

Unused. See Templates for discussion/Log/2013 December 15 for the TfD of a (used) clone. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 17:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * delete or userfy. Frietjes (talk) 00:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'd like it userfied. Epicgenius (talk) 00:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:GTRI evolution

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 February 23 Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 01:16, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * GTRI evolution
 * GTRI
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:African American caricatures and stereotypes

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * African American caricatures and stereotypes

crass racism, created by an SPA for god knows what reason aprock (talk) 06:48, 12 February 2014 (UTC) For whatever reason, template spamming has become the favorite game of marginal editors, this should probably be deleted.
 * Keep I've never participated in a TfD before, so forgive me if I don't know the lingo, but which part of WP:TFD does this fail? It's useful, it's not redundant, it can't possibly fail naming guidelines, and anyone who thinks that a list of stereotypes is "crass racism" doesn't know anything about the social sciences.  Look at the title of this book:
 * This is a useful template and a misguided nomination.&mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 05:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Magna Carta Holy Grail track listing
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Magna Carta Holy Grail track listing

Per previous consensus for templates like this, it is considered redundant and should be deleted. — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 06:07, 4 February 2014 (UTC) <hr style="width:55%;" />
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 04:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

<hr style="width:55%;" />
 * delete, redundant navigation. Frietjes (talk) 16:48, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete – Why can't it just be merged with Magna Carta Holy Grail? Epicgenius (talk) 19:12, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.