Wikipedia:Trading card game/Action plan/Phase 2:Cards/Individual card proposals/Approved cards needing a quote before they can be illustrated
When suggesting a quote, please LINK TO the actual quote and post the quote and its quotee as well. |
"Good" articles can bypass this page. |
Poem by a Wikipedian[edit]
- Name of card: Poem by a Wikipedian
- Class: Article (bad)
- Text: None.
- Proposed by: Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 04:28, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Quote suggestions
Comments
Comments from the card's original proposal
|
---|
Explain. I don't get how it would be an article card. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 20:02, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
|
Bill the Troll[edit]
- Name of card: Bill the Troll
- Class: Vandal
- Text: While in play, this troll causes one vandalism at the beginning of each player's turn.
- Proposed by: Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 16:34, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Quote suggestions
- "Please do not feed the trolls." Bananaclasic (talk) 18:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Love it...the illustration that usually accompanies this with the country-style guy in the hat would be perfect for the name "Bill", too! Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 03:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- How can you love it? That quote is so boring! I think that we should have one that is actually interesting, funny, unknown, whatever... Not this, however!
Extended content
|
---|
Comments
Sounds good. Mix all of those ideas into a proposal, and I'll comment on them. :) ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 00:11, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
|
Sally the Troll[edit]
- Name of card: Sally the Troll
- Class: Vandal
- Text: While in play, this troll causes two bad cards to be turned over at the beginning of each player's turn.
- Proposed by: Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs)
Image suggestions
Comments
Extended content
|
---|
Yep. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 00:01, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
|
Ricardo the Troll[edit]
- Name of card: Ricardo the Troll
- Class: Vandal
- Text: This particularly difficult troll requires double the sacrifice to report or block that a normal vandal would.
- Proposed by: Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs)
Quote Suggestion
“To live is to war with trolls.” -Henrik Ibsen TheQ Editor (Talk) 21:43, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Image suggestions
Comments
Extended content
|
---|
Yep again. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 00:01, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
|
Marvin the Troll[edit]
- Name of card: Troll
- Class: Vandal
- Text: While in play, this troll causes one bad card to be turned over for every
article in play relating to a famous personbiographical article in play. - Proposed by: Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs)
Quote suggestions
Comments
Extended content
|
---|
{{{1}}}
|
Melville the troll[edit]
- Class: Vandal
- Text: While in play, this troll causes one bad card to be turned over for every article in play relating to a politician or politics in general.
- Proposed by: CanvasHat 12:57, 27 November 2010 (UTC) although it was Nicky's idea.
Comments
Extended content
|
---|
I think an explanation of how it would attack articles on politicians would be good. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 18:17, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
|
False edit[edit]
- Name of card: False edit
- Class: Discord/Vandalism/Edit (bad)
- Text: In one of your articles, you have added false data. +1 vandalism.
- Proposed by: Nicky Nouse (talk · contribs · count · logs) 27 November 2010
Quote suggestions
"long signatures give undue prominence to a given user's contribution." —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 02:25, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- Wrong card, Nicky? Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:02, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oh. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 02:56, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Extended content
|
---|
Seems fine. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 03:58, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
|
Big sig[edit]
- Name of card:Freakishly long sig
- Class: Discord
- Text:Rodriguez Alfonzo Jalapeno Terre Peeetre le Gorgo CXXXVIII, the troll who always signs his posts, even in article namespace, causing server overload, has signed his posts. You can not play instant cards this turn.
- Proposed by: --CanvasHat 13:15, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Quote suggestions
- "Your signature is rather long; it takes up four lines.... Don't get me wrong, I think it's nice, but I'd recommend shortening it." — SUIT (talk · contribs)
- I am sure there are more humorous ones out there, but this is one that caught my attention. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 22:37, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- No, I think that it is great. It has my support. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 00:50, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support —Airhogs777 (complaints • evidence • job) 06:20, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Card design suggestions
We could have something really long that runs right off the card. For example:
© English Wikipedia Department of Fun
—Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 02:09, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- The card must be printable, though. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 21:14, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- I like the idea; we can just cut off whatever runs over, preferably cutting off half of a word. We need to make sure that the link is legible, however. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 19:26, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds feasible. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 19:58, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- I totally just realized you created a template specifically to demonstrate that...I'd be curious to see how else you intend on using that template... Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 06:17, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe, we could make it all just a long name, with titles, like so: "His highness King Rodriguez Alfonzo Jalapeno Terre Peeetre le Gorgo CXXXVIII, the troll who always signs his posts, even in article namespace, causing server overload at the most inconvenient times, Lord of Hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliaphobiaville, Baron Lopadotemachoselachogaleokranioleipsanodrimhypotrimmatosilphioparaomelitokatakechymenokichlepikossyphophattoperisteralektryonoptekephalliokigklopeleiolagoiosiraiobaphetraganopterygonia,Supreme Tyrant of the West Watchmendarkknightreturnskillingjokesandmanroadtoperditionsupermanendoftimecivilwarclonesagasnowbirdsdontflyallstarbatmanandrobintheboywondercrisisoninfiniteearthsinfinitecrisisidentitycrisisourworldsatwarsflashpointfinalcrisissoylentgreenwaspeoplesnapekillsdumbledorewinstonsmithdiesattheendsin City just signed a post. Good luck." Except replacing that last one with something equally long, except without all the copyright violations...--CanvasHat 23:39, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- I totally just realized you created a template specifically to demonstrate that...I'd be curious to see how else you intend on using that template... Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 06:17, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Or just a bunch of middle names. Do you remember that '97 Cinderella movie? It had a song called "The Prince is Giving a Ball" and the announcer guy was reading from official documents, which listed the prince's full name, "His royal highness Christopher Rupert Vwindemier Vlandamier Carl Alexander Francois Reginald Lancelot Herman Gregory James, son of her majesty Queen Constantina Charlotte Hermantrude Guenivere Mazie Margareet Ann, son of his majesty King Maximillian Godfee Ladeslous Leapolt Sydney Frederick John". —Airhogs777 (complaints • evidence • alibi) @WikiShrek 06:50, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Extended content
|
---|
Seems good. although we may not be able to fit all of that onto a card. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 21:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
|
Seduced By the Dark Side[edit]
- Name of card: Seduced By the Dark Side
- Class: Discord
- Text: You have vandalized and are banned for one turn, vandalism for one article.
- Proposed by: Nicky Nouse (talk · contribs · count · logs) 25 November, 2010
Comments
Extended content
|
---|
When you vandalize Wikipedia, no-one wins! —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs) 03:03, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Seems fine; we need a link for the title, though. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 03:26, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
|
Alphonso the Troll[edit]
- Name of card: Alphonso the Troll
- Class: Vandal
- Text: Turn over one bad card if there is a video-game-related article in play (unless you really want one of your articles to be vandalized, then it can apply to that, instead.)
- Proposed by: CanvasHat 13:04, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Extended content
|
---|
Ignore the sechead----CanvasHat 13:04, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Special pages are hard to make, naturally special cards would be rare. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 04:01, 28 November 2010 (UTC) Maybe the link should be WP:UN. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 05:13, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
• contribs • wikia) 15:59, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
I don't know if it's my place to, but I've changed it. If you're uncomfortable with ME being the one who changes it, feel free to undo. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 02:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
|
False reference[edit]
- Name of card: False reference
- Class: Discord/Vandalism/Edit (bad)
- Text: In one of your articles, you have used false data from another article. +1 vandalism.
- Proposed by: Nicky Nouse (talk · contribs · count · logs) 27 November 2010
Comments
Extended content
|
---|
A simpler variation in proposal below.
I prefer the one below, but either works. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 03:58, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
|
Noticed![edit]
- Name of card: Noticed!
- Class: User
- Text: An editor has stumbled upon and contributed to a page. +1 class for an article of your choice.
- User access level: Anon
- Proposed by: Nicky Nouse (talk · contribs · count · logs) 30 November 2010
Comments
Extended content
|
---|
Seems good. This should be a rare-ish card, however. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 03:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
I changed it, although I don't know why I keep thinking of cards that will infringe on copyrights. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 09:00, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
|
Anti-vandal[edit]
- Name of card: Anti-vandal
- Class: Anti-vandal
- Text: An anti-vandal has located an article and helped it. -1 vandalism counter.
- User access level: Anon
- Proposed by: Nicky Nouse (talk · contribs · count · logs) 30 November 2010
Comments
Extended content
|
---|
Good one! ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 03:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
|
Quote Suggestions
"Defending the wiki and crushing vandals since 2001." TheQ Editor (Talk) 21:34, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Admins ignoring policy[edit]
- Name of card: Admins ignoring policy
- Class: Wikipedia (bad)
- Text: No admin powers can be used while this card is in play
- Proposed by: Antony–22 (talk ⁄ contribs) 05:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Extended content
|
---|
Listed at WP:LAME#Userboxes, this is a deleted userbox reading "This user is pissed/annoyed about admins ignoring policy." Not sure what effect is should have, but seems like a good concept to build a card around. Antony–22 (talk ⁄ contribs) 05:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
|
The weather in London[edit]
- Name of card: The weather in London
- Class: Article (bad)
- Text:
- Proposed by: Antony–22 (talk ⁄ contribs) 05:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Extended content
|
---|
Listed at WP:LAME#Meta pages. Antony–22 (talk ⁄ contribs) 05:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
|
List of virgins[edit]
- Name of card: List of virgins
- Class: Article (bad)
- Text:
- Proposed by: Antony–22 (talk ⁄ contribs) 05:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Image comments
I was just thinking of how to illustrate some of these and i saw this... I was all for this when i realized that the illustration may be...questionable any ideas...
- Umm, isn't being a virgin sort of the opposite of pornography? There are two pictures on the article Virginity which should do quite well. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 22:33, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, in Sunday school you learn about Virgin Mary before you learn what "virgin" actually means. It does, I admit, have to do with "...questionable" things, but this one will be easy enough to do with out "questions." —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs • wikia) 04:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Listed at WP:LAME#Lists. Antony–22 (talk ⁄ contribs) 05:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
|
Category:Wikipedian chemists[edit]
- Name of card: Chemist
- Class: User
- Text: Every time you play a chemistry article, you may advance it one extra rank.
- Proposed by: Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs)
Comments
Extended content
|
---|
This is the first user-class proposal. As such, let me remind everyone what a user-class card is. During the setup phase, two decks are built. A good article is pulled from the good deck and put into play, and the decks are then shuffled.
So why is this a user card and not an instant? It seems like a user card should give a bonus in the course of other actions played, rather than just have an instant effect. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 20:51, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
|
WikiProject Chemistry[edit]
- Name of card: WikiProject Chemistry
- Class: Wikipedia (good)
- Text: Immediately improve all chemistry-related articles in play (i.e. remove vandalism or upgrade class). All subsequent new chemistry articles start at start class instead of stub class.
- Proposed by: Antony–22 (talk ⁄ contribs) 20:50, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Extended content
|
---|
We need more synergies in this game. I think we should have a number of "WikiProject" cards with similar effects to this one on different topics. I selected chemistry for this one as I've proposed a number of chemical element cards above; space would be another good one since we seem to have a glut of those article cards already. Antony–22 (talk ⁄ contribs) 20:50, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Would all CJs coming as a result of extra article improvements (including the bit for new articles) go to the person who played the card? If so, I think that either this should be an EXTREMELY rare card, or it should only be like that for the instant half; for the WP-class half, it should be divided up somehow, perhaps going in a clockwise direction every turn. The CJ gain would be too easily accessible and to large, otherwise. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 06:01, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Fine! I will allow this, but don't even try to convince me that messing with someone's actual CJ count is a good idea! I still oppose any card with that in mind!</rant> ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:51, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
|
Popularity[edit]
- Name of card: Popular Transclusion
- Class: Can't figure one, Edit is closest
- Text: A template you've written has been used in 100 articles; pick 3 cards from the good deck and select a favorite.
- Proposed by: Nicky Nouse (talk · contribs · count · logs) 23 November 2010
Extended content
|
---|
{{{1}}}
|
WP:Patent Nonsense[edit]
- Name of card: awssdxddttgtfyg
- Class: Vandalism
- Text: Vandalize A-class article, or highest class available.
- Proposed by: CanvasHat 15:47, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Comments Maybe one of us can scribble on a piece of paper with oil pastels or crayons or markers?--CanvasHat 23:39, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Or in paint. How about this?
--CanvasHat 23:47, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ignoring the fact that this step is for finding quotes, I tink you're an amazing artist but crayons/markers might make it seem like we put more than 10 seconds of work into the card while still maintaining the randomness we're trying to get across. Something about MS paint drawings just irks me for some reason. —Airhogs777 (complaints • evidence • alibi) @WikiShrek 06:55, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, we need a quote too, don't we. Well, since we have no real guideline for a quote besides, ya know, being WP-related, I found a randomish WP-related quote (on WikiQuote) that made me smirk: "Individuals who have tried to edit the pages about Barack Obama — to reflect the incontrovertible fact that he is not God, Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, or Ronald Reagan — report that their contributions have vanished within minutes of posting them." - L. Neil Smith, "Announcifications From Your Publicatorialist: Wikipedia, Missouri, and Ceres", 15 March 2009 —Airhogs777 (complaints • evidence • alibi) @WikiShrek 07:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- I hope you aren't seriously thinking we could use that quote... As for the picture, it bugs me as well. I think we can come up with something better. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 19:55, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- What, you don't appreciate the weeks of tireless nights it took me to find a Wikipedia-related quote? —Airhogs777 (complaints • evidence • alibi) @WikiShrek 08:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Nope. Not at all. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 19:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- As for a quote, what about The cheeses has eaten my friend from WP:DAFT --CanvasHat 05:05, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Probably not the best picture idea. :) As for the quote, it doesn't really say much of anything... ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 18:23, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Well the quote not saying anything is exactly what we're going for, is it not? As for the pic, I still think it would be perfect if we redid your original scribble in crayon. —Airhogs777 (complaints • evidence • alibi) @WikiShrek 06:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- I think we should want the card to make a bit more sense; the quote seems too moronic, and the picture seems too unprofessional. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 04:52, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- If you really want a quote related to the card, how about "Content that, while apparently intended to mean something, is so confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it. See schizophasia. If the meaning cannot be identified, it would be impossible to accurately copy-edit the text." by 86.142.67.57 (revision 388566230 of WP:Patent nonsense)? —Airhogs777 (complaints • evidence • alibi) @WikiShrek 00:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- I like that, but it seems a bit long... ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 00:05, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- Personally, I think just the first sentence is good enough if we need to shorten it. —Airhogs777 (complaints • evidence • alibi) @WikiShrek 22:53, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- I agree. Unless we can find something funny, this quote works well. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 03:09, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- Just stopping by...hi everyone! Y'all live! I agree...some nicer illustration is in order here for sure. I bet...there's something in the Commons that is patented nonsense...how about this? Of course, we'd need to crop the litter out of it. Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 02:59, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- Barely alive... All that has happened for quite a while are comments in this section. :) I like that picture, and agree that cropping would be necessary. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 03:24, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- Cropped. Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 22:37, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- Perfect! ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 23:25, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Barely alive? More like undead :) I like the new pic. We skipped a step... but nobody really cares, do they? —Airhogs777 (complaints • evidence • alibi) @WikiShrek 00:41, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Nope. And I'd like to point out that, as prophesied, this project is a zombie project now. Bloodthirstily accepting any newcomers. Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 17:39, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- It seems like a pretty pathetic zombie; aren't they usually a bit more intimidating? ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 06:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- So then, are we ready to illustrate and skip a step? This one card could be the one that gets our project running again! —Airhogs777 (complaints • evidence • alibi) @WikiShrek 07:27, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- Still looking for a job and have lots of stuff on my plate right now, otherwise I'd do some illustrations. Will you pay me to do it? Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 18:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- Of course! Will you accept third Zimbabwean dollars? ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 22:41, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- Still looking for a job and have lots of stuff on my plate right now, otherwise I'd do some illustrations. Will you pay me to do it? Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 18:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- So then, are we ready to illustrate and skip a step? This one card could be the one that gets our project running again! —Airhogs777 (complaints • evidence • alibi) @WikiShrek 07:27, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- It seems like a pretty pathetic zombie; aren't they usually a bit more intimidating? ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 06:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Comments Looks good to me! Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 03:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC) Link, darn you! Good otherwise. I think that I need to add something about that to the editnotice; I hate saying this constantly. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 05:56, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
|
No angry mastodons[edit]
- Name of card: No angry mastodons
- Class: Wikipedia (good)
- Text: Negate the effects of the next three discord cards played.
- Proposed by: Antony–22 (talk ⁄ contribs) 20:50, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Quote suggestions:
Lol...not quite a quotable conversation, but I got a kick out of this. Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 18:19, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
"WHYS YOUS KIL ME MASTODON" (Not said by anyone, but should still work) Sungodtemple (talk) 13:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Comments
|
Infobox[edit]
- Name of card: Infobox
- Class: Edit
- Text: May only be applied to C-class or lower articles.
- User access level: Anonymous
- Proposed by: Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 04:15, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Comments Seems fine. However, maybe we want to not allow this to be used for higher-level articles? It seems that it would be sort of odd to add an infobox to make a GA an FA, since it would obviously need one to become a GA in the first place. Perhaps we should not allow it for improvements to B-class or higher? ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 06:14, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
|
Sock Puppet[edit]
- Name of card: Sock Puppet
- Class: Vandal
- Text: You have been found to be a sock puppet and are banned for 2 full rounds.
- Proposed by: Thomas888b (talk)
Quote suggestions
First of all, change the link to WP:SOCK. My suggestion: "You may look very suspicious if you own a sock puppet." by Optim from the second revision of WP:SOCK. I also think there will be some pretty creepy pictures we could use on this card. —Preceding signed comment added by Airhogs777 (talk • contribs • wikia) 23:25, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- I think that we can probably find a better quote; I think that we should go for a funny one with this card. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 00:48, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
{{{1}}}
|
WP:OVERLINK[edit]
- Name of card:Sea of Blue
- Class: Article (Good)
- Text:Starts with 3 vandalism.Do not recieve Cj for removing these.
- Note:If any disputes come up about Cj, I'll ask Hi when he comes back. Cuz' he is the Great and Knowledgable one in this field.
- Note: nvmd, I'll just ask him now.
- Protected?: NO
- Proposed by: CanvasHat
Quote Suggestions
"Unless they are particularly relevant to the topic of the article, avoid linking plain English words." from WP:OVERLINK can be partially attributed to Ckatz. I suppose it gets the point across.—Preceding signed comment added by Airhogs777 (talk • contribs • wikia) 05:01, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Mind linking to that revision? The page history is somewhat ugly, and I'm having a hard time telling which part of that quote Ckatz actually provided. Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 00:24, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Here ya go. Like I said, partial attribution (the first half), although the edit summary implies that it might have been copied from another part of the article... WAAAAH!!!!! *floods internet in tears* —Preceding signed comment added by Airhogs777 (talk • contribs • wikia) 05:44, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I guess it's [his] fault the sentence was ever created... —Preceding signed comment added by Airhogs777 (talk • contribs • wikia) 05:45, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Works for me. Hopefully their tempers I'm seeing expressed in the edit history won't flame up if they see who got credited. Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 20:33, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- The quote looks fine to me. By the way, the CJ issue isn't actually an issue; you don't get them for removing vandalism. However, I don't like that we are calling this an article at all; the page linked to is a WP-space page. Last time I checked, those aren't articles, good or bad. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 00:47, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Comments
What I would recommend is that this actually be a good article card instead of a bad one, and just have it start with three vandalisms. Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 16:57, 3 March 2011 (UTC) |
Link rot[edit]
- Name of card: Link rot
- Class: Vandalism
- Text: None
- Proposed by: Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs)
Quote suggestions
How 'bout "I understand that the website was the original source, but I am reluctant to leave broken links." -Open2universe from Wikipedia talk:Link rot? —Preceding signed comment added by Airhogs777 (talk • contribs • wikia) 19:58, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
- I like this one:
- Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 00:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Sometimes you really make me wish there was a [Like] button in the randomest places... —Preceding signed comment added by Airhogs777 (talk • contribs • wikia) 07:12, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Like |
Airhogs777 and Bob the Wikipedian like this.
- Spiffy! Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 04:36, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- Many people (myself included) probably won't get that at first glance; I think that we want something a bit easier to understand without putting a ton of thought to it. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 00:43, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Comments
No text? What happens, then? ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 00:15, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
|