Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music/Peer review

{| width=100% cellpadding=5 style="background-color:#f5f9ff; border:1px solid #bfd7ff;" {| width=100% cellpadding=10 style="background-color:#e1edff; border:1px solid #bfd7ff; margin-bottom:0px"
 * colspan=2 style="padding-bottom:0px"|

Peer review
Here, articles are scrutinised by the Alternative music WikiProject editors for factual accuracy and style. Articles are still submitted at Peer review, but placing them here is likely to ensure a greater and more detailed response from knowledgable editors.


 * }

Jim Neversink
I'd like this article to reach good article status. His new CD is to be released internationally and there is a pretty firm belief that Neversink will reach notability outside of South Africa when it happens. So we should have a good article on him...

N.B. I hope I'm doing this the right way?! I wanted to post on the prose review page but was redirected to this one. Sorry... is there a wrong link or is prose and peer the same??

-- Skara B  11:28, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Vices & Virtues
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like some suggestions on how to improve it, as I've read it over and it reads quite well to me. I'm not the most well-versed in the topic area, so as someone with limited knowledge of the band, I understood the article quite well. That being said, any suggestions for improving it would be fantastic! Thanks! Yaminator  talk 23:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Other

 * Peer review/I Should Coco/archive1
 * White Lies (band), awaiting peer review (here)