Wikipedia talk:Scholarly journal

Your recent edits
Regarding this edit, I interpret this, of course, as another attempt at recoloniZation! That aside, these were good edits. I'm glad you brought this to Linguist at Large's attention. Drmies (talk) 17:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed changes/addtions
1. Add a tl;dr summary at the top:

2. Add a sentence mentioning the incongruity of using a given journal as a reliable source for other articles while that same journal is deemed not notable in terms of having an article itself.

What do you think of these ideas? &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  21:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)