Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Animal anatomy

Splitting discussion for Clitoris
An article that you have edited or that may interest you, (Clitoris), has content that I have proposed to be removed and moved to another article, (Human clitoris). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 05:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Project-independent quality assessments
Quality assessments are used by Wikipedia editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a class parameter to WikiProject banner shell, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to WikiProject banner shell, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project decides to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass WPBannerMeta a new custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:01, 9 April 2023 (UTC)


 * For what it's worth I think that this is a great idea and am fully supporting of inheriting ratings for this fairly inactive project. Tom (LT) (talk) 06:06, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Kidney
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Kidney that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 21:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Determining the future of B-checklists
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council § Determining the future of B-class checklists. &#x0020;This project is being notified since it is one of the 82 WikiProjects that opted to support B-checklists (B1-B6) in your project banner. DFlhb (talk) 11:24, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Can't believe this exists
I can't believe this exists.

I'm an autistic veterinarian opthamologist extremely frustrated with the lack of animal coverage in vision related articles.

Some articles like visible spectrum and night vision are great articles because they have a lot of animal coverage which I'm a supporter on.

Meanwhile underwater vision? This is an article we need to do our jobs on. Why on earth is an article that should be about how underwater vision works for marine life ends up being all about underwater vision in humans and underwater vision in animals is only in a paragraph on fish? This is just ridiculous.

So, happy to work with you all, and let's make animal coverage better! LoverOfAllAnimalsActivist (talk) 10:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Greetings!
 * I have checked some of your edits (special:diff/1211008144, special:diff/1211006779). Take a look at Notability. An article about a topic can be created if at least one review article about the topic exists. So each article has its own scope. You should determine the topic and edit the article in the scope of the topic. If an article is about humans, then it should describe the topic in context of humans (without any common definitions). If you transform the article about humans into an article about the topic in animals, it might be deleted if no review sources will be found that cover the topic in animals context. Also please read the Reliable sources guideline and No original research policy. D6194c-1cc (talk) 09:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)