Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Television stations task force

Slow edit warring by
Since I was diagnosed with macular degeneration in 2022, I've been working with the WP:WCAG in an effort to improve accessibility in articles across Wikipedia. I have been trying out different scripts to aid in my editing. Recently I've been working on improving US radio and television articles, and rarely seem to run into problems with the radio articles. The television articles are a different story. , if not outright reverting my work, quickly changes the article to reflect how they think it should be: diff 1, diff 2, diff 3 dif 4. From my perspective it seems is acting as if they own TV station articles, it's discouraging to me when they accuse me of being a "picky" editor. I'm only here to help build and maintain an encyclopedia that's accessible to all, not deal with petty edit-warring. - BlueboyLINY (talk) 03:22, 26 January 2024 (UTC)


 * First of all, I didn't know about your condition. I take back my "picky editor" remark. Second, I don't intend to be "owning" articles. The first three diffs are minor reversions; Houston and Houston, Texas point to the same article. I left everything else alone until the matter is settled, because I don't want to risk getting blocked. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
 * As another active editor in the space, I've done a lot of work to improve accessibility in our topic area. More specifically, I wanted to respond to the diffs mentioned by @BlueboyLINY. Obviously, you are aware of the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section since you participated in it. I personally prefer the shorter approach for "world cities", but the question is unsettled thanks to low participation in the discussion, and the fact is that right now the style is the other way. And I will advocate for television station to be linked in sentence 1, no matter what; it's the X in Y type of the article, and it so obviously merits linking that it should not even be a subject of debate.
 * Our lead sentences can get odd, and it doesn't help that even veteran editors in other fields can trip over the way things are worded or titled in this one. When WWJ-TV hit the Main Page last week, a non-topic editor raised the question of whether it is a TV station "in" Detroit because neither its studio nor its transmitter are actually in the city, though it is the city of license.
 * I don't like saying this publicly, but I feel it's merited to say it because those of us who have worked with him a lot can vouch for it. Mvcg is a very diligent editor who has done so much antivandalism work on our articles and means well, but communication has been a routine weakness of his. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 05:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your input. I recognize my own communication weakness (odd coming from someone who worked for radio and tv stations for fifty years, albeit most of those years were in engineering or audio/video editing) it's something I continue to work on. I guess it's a case of getting off on the wrong foot with Mvcg66b3r all those years ago when I first encountered him. I'm aware of his anti-vandalism work and do appreciate it. I guess when you have two editors who are weak communicators you need a mediator. Which is why I came here to air my grievance rather than try to communicate on his talk page. And I certainly didn't want to get ARV involved, so again thank you Sammi for being our mediator.
 * Going forward, i'll be tweaking the script edits to manually leave the links in the infobox and lead. As for the am/p.m. issue I'm neither here nor there on that, and it would be too time consuming to correct manually. Hopefully will reply either here or on my talk page. - BlueboyLINY (talk) 06:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television § Linking in ledes for network-owned stations
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television § Linking in ledes for network-owned stations. Nathan Obral • he/him • t  •  c  • 21:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

FCC callsigns vs. ICAO codes
User:Mseingth2133444 recently moved KPDX to KPDX-TV without consensus, saying it was to remove ambiguity with Portland International Airport (KPDX is its ICAO airport code). I moved it further to KPDX (TV) as there's no "-TV" suffix in the official callsign. I did this for another station, KASN to KASN (TV) (KASN is the ICAO code for Talladega Municipal Airport). Do you think these articles should go back to their original titles (since ICAO codes are rarely commonly used)? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Is the airport code the only other use of the acronym? Then it can be handled with a hatnote. Both articles need to be moved back. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 17:47, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Going to disagree, the ICAO code would likely be used more (by pilots, etc.) instead of the FCC code which would only be known to who? Portlanders? I'll agree to moving it back if this reaches consenus. Mseingth2133444 (Did I mess up? Let me know here) 20:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Setting aside my annoyance about overcoverage of anything with a business license in Portland on en.wiki, the TV station>airport here, which is simply known as PDX locally without the K casually. A hatnote on top the article for channel 49 easily handles those looking for PDX, and it should be moved back to KPDX.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:48, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * For the general public (our audience here), the ICAO code is at best a tertiary identifier for the airport, after its name and the IATA code, whereas the call sign is the primary identifier for the broadcast facility (whether TV or radio). Hatnote on the TV station if there are only the two uses, or disambiguation page if there are more than two - that's pretty much been standard in these cases for as long as I've been around (which is way too long at this point). Mlaffs (talk) 02:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * What I've done is had the undiscussed move reverted. I'll then open a requested move to discuss these two. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 23:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Please link to it. Mseingth2133444  ( talk / contribs ) 23:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Unless it's on the talk page. Mseingth2133444  ( talk / contribs ) 23:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Fix your signature please (no redirects). Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ Previously there were redirects due to a length limitation. Now can we stop discussing my signature please? Mseingth2133444  ( talk / contribs ) 00:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Mseingth2133444 + @Mlaffs The reason I have not opened this discussion is because it has taken longer than an expected for an admin to move the talk pages back to the titles where they belong. Both are up for G6 housekeeping speedy deletion. I will ping you, Mseingth, when this discussion is opened. @Mvcg66b3r, there is no need to minimod, and many users have redirects in their signatures (especially if they do not maintain a separate userpage). Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 03:59, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Mop wielded - talk page moves complete. Mlaffs (talk) 04:44, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Discussion now at Talk:KASN. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 05:33, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:American major traditional television networks
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:American major traditional television networks that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Disney Junior
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Disney Junior that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 00:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:ABC News
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:ABC News that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 11:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)