Talk:2011 Super League season results
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Suitable Deletion[edit]
Put simply, I can find no documentation on how to request a page deletion, could someone please do so for me? Should there be no response here over the next hour, I'll page blank. I believe this is strictly against the rules but this page is pointless and I wish to attract attention, I guess it'd send a message about the ridiculous lack of info we have. There are numerous resources (BBC, Sky, RFL, even SL itself) who all list the fixtures and results. Also, this hadn't been updated in weeks, showing severe disinterest from even the individual who created this page. It simply isn't necessary. Assistance please? Aidyzzle (talk) 02:34, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- I suggest you start by reading WP:AFD, which details the steps you need to follow to nominate an article for deletion. Julianhall (talk) 14:36, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Contested deletion[edit]
This page should not be speedy deleted because... --MCSparki (talk) 05:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC) This page contains the results for the weekly matches and it does contain information at the introduction, it is not just links MCSparki (talk) 05:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- This page should not be speedy deleted because, as MCSparki observes, it contains more than simple links, it contains the season's results and fixtures. As has been discussed before, displaying fixtures before the matches have been played is technically a copyright infringement, so maybe they should be hidden. Overall, however, i see no reason to remove this page, especially as there are several similar pages on Wikipedia as precendent. If we remove this, we should remove the others. Strong keep. --Julianhall (talk) 09:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Note to reviewing admins[edit]
Speedy deletion has been declined twice in one day by TexasAndroid and myself. -- Donald Albury 20:32, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- User:Aidyzzle has prodded the article here with the reasoning "The results which this page is set up to list, haven't been updated for over a month. The creator of the page no longer appears to exist, there are also numerous alternative, completely free sources outside of this site. It is simply unnecessary to keep this page.". I do not find it being out of date or its creator no longer being active a valid reason for deleting a page, so have deprodded it and [informed the user to take it to WP:AFD if they still feel this way. Heiro 00:01, 8 June 2011 (UTC)