Talk:Angel Bakeries

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAngel Bakeries has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 14, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 24, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Angel Bakeries is the sole supplier of hamburger buns for McDonald's restaurants in Israel?

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Angel Bakeries/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:21, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Okay, I'll bite - am intrigued about company articles so will take a look and make straightforward copyedits as I go and jot queries below: Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:21, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
the company has always been on the cutting edge of innovation and efficiency. -unnecessary and impresses as promotional - let the innovations speak for themselves.
Erm, can you align the spelling of Bayit VeGan - which is right...?
Salomon Angel entered the business with his typical enterprising zeal. - somewhat effusive. Could be rendered more neutral I think.
water and flour were at a premium --> "water and flour were in short supply" (?)
Notwithstanding the emphasis on innovation and automation, Angel's challahs are still braided by hand. - sentence looking very lonely sitting there by itself - can it be tacked onto some paragraph somewhere?
Today the company, known as Angel Bakeries, owns and operates five plants: - don't use bolding in body of text. Also, can we get a date and ref for the name change?
Ovadia Angel and his team developed plant-based emulsifiers which were kosher, and later sold this new knowledge to other companies - any further information on this? This is one of the bits of the article that would be good to expand upon if possible - ditto the two hour mixer in the next segment. Any chemistry info a big plus.

 DoneThanks for starting the review. I appreciate your comments. I did the initial copyediting for tone; I'll look up more references over the next couple of days. Yoninah (talk) 09:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I found a source available in Google Books snippet view which speaks about the plant-based emulsifiers. I was able to add only the little bit that I could see and use this source as a ref, but not much more. Unfortunately, my Hebrew is not good enough to look up articles on technical subjects like emulsifiers on Hebrew Google. I also could not find additional information on the 2-hour mixer. Regarding the company name change, I suspect it was in 1984, when the company went public and began expanding, but I am unable to find a ref; therefore I just left the two names in the lead, as people do call the company either way. Best, Yoninah (talk) 21:02, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, that extra smidgen of detail is helpful - and you can only add what you can. Template a'comin'. Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:22, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:


Overall:

Pass or Fail: Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:26, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the positive review! Yoninah (talk) 10:53, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
When will the GA icon be added to the article? Yoninah (talk) 14:04, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Angel Bakeries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Angel Bakeries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]