Talk:Blu Mar Ten

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Would not recommend speedy deletion for this page, artist is notable[edit]

Hello. I haven't edited Wikipedia in a long time, but I thought I would ask why you have nominated the article Blu mar ten for speedy deletion. I am not the page author, and agree it needs some work, but the artist is not non-notable - they were one of the major artists on Good Looking Records, another article which also needs work. The problem may be that there has been a problem for many people editing articles based on Drum and bass, and so they are all relatively weak. However, I feel that Wikipedia affords articles to many artists from smaller or niche genres, and that Blu mar ten deserve one by virtue of their past importance to a specific music scene and their continued activity as DJs and producers within the scene.

I don't keep an active user page any more, but will continue to watch this talk page and the article in question.I have copied this comment onto the talk page there. I would rather not go through the whole votes for deletion process, or even speedy deletion, as it seems a bit redundant when a search for the artist name on amazon.com will bring up a whole list of releases on various record labels. Thanks for your time, hope my tone is polite, I am a bit rusty on wikipedia protocol.

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=blu+mar+ten&x=0&y=0

98.26.113.150 (talk) 05:23, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

whilst Im at it, if the tone and style is the only problem, I will happily fix them myself to save the article from deletion. It does read a bit like a myspace bio, but I can fix that over the weekend in a few minutes. I don't want to spend an hour cleaning it up only to have it deleted. thanks98.26.113.150 (talk) 05:26, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added standard music artist template[edit]

... because artist is definitely notable, with around 15 years of commercial releases across a few genres. We just need to get the article in shape to show this. There are plenty references to be found.

Haute Pie (talk) 12:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to more correct URL - talk page for old URL is above this entry.[edit]

The copy/move to the new URL (to which the old now redirects) I believe generated a speedy deletion tag. As discussed above (from the previous talk page), this artist is clearly notable enough for inclusion – the old page was not contested further. I believe this is reason enough to disregard this 'new' speedy deletion.

Haute Pie (talk) 21:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blu Mar Ten. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.imorecords.co.uk/drumandbass/blu-mar-ten-biography/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090302005227/http://www.blumarten.com:80/home/? to http://www.blumarten.com/home

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]