Talk:Bubsy in Fractured Furry Tales

Bubsy in Fractured Furry Tales has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 23, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Ghosts (Pac-Man) (1 participant)
Midnight.works (1 participant)
Revenge of the Killer Robots from Hell (2 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (3 participants)
International Hobo (1 participant)
Wally Scharold (4 participants)
Cake Mania (series) (1 participant)
Omocat (5 participants)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (17 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bubsy in Fractured Furry Tales/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 17:10, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Lead

I'd recommend mentioning the release dates (especially since "1994 video game" doesn't apply to the European version).

Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Gameplay

Is there a source to say that the returning elements were in a previous entry?

Changed the sentence. Roberth Martinez (talk) 21:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Development and release

Is Jaguar Sector a reliable source?
Is FPToday a reliable source? Can you find the relevant press release on a more reliable source if not?

I would classify both Jaguar Sector II and Nine Lives as situational sources; Jaguar Sector II was a website similar to Planet Virtual Boy, dedicated to the Atari Jaguar, where they had their own databases for games and their release dates, while Nine Lives is a repostory for press releases related to games on the Atari Jaguar. (P.S. I vaguely remember that the release dates from Jaguar Sector II came both from press releases and magazines, not pure speculation...) Roberth Martinez (talk) 20:48, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just to double check since I don't wanna have to translate the text, who, if any, does the March 1995 issue of Maniac confirm worked on the game?

I can positively say that Maniac magazine does indeed says who worked on the game at the top on the game's name in the review. I translated that text via Google Translate - Producer: Faran Thomason • Programmers: Andrew Seed • Graphics: David Severn, Steve Noake • Sound: Alastair Lindsey, Kevin Saville • Design: Jody Cobb. Roberth Martinez (talk) 15:33, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, great. I wasn't doubting it, I just didn't want to have to do the work, haha. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 17:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, i see you cheeky little gremlin XD (P.S. so, is there anything else left to be done?) Roberth Martinez (talk) 18:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I just need to check the Reception section and it should be good. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:02, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so i went ahead and did some last-minute work in the reception section. Roberth Martinez (talk) 23:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Fair use rationale for screenshot has missing fields, and the purpose of use should argue a more specific purpose if possible.

Done -- I added additional information into the gameplay image file ([1]). Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:13, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cukie Gherkin:I addressed the points raised. If there's anything necessary left to be done then, let me know! Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was gonna work on it more, but I got a migraine so I needed to rest my poor head. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 22:24, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh OK. Try to get well. I will wait for more comments! Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the delay, Reception looks solid. Passed. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 06:31, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cukie Gherkin:Don't worry about thae delay! Thanks for reviewing the article :D (P.S. - I also have this game on standby for GA review [Baldies] so if you're interested in doing the GA review for that one then, let me know!) Roberth Martinez (talk) 16:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]