Talk:Clinton Portis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

HS Track[edit]

"clocking 10.6 in the 900 meters"

900 meters in 10.6 seconds (presumably) is inhuman. The time or the distance has to be incorrect here. I'm not too familiar with track and field events, but it would make sense if Portis ran the 100m in 10.6 seconds. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.113.129.178 (talk) 15:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

This article needs an image.

Characters[edit]

Are these characters and all of these related links really encyclopedic? The guy is a football player with a below-average team. It just seems excessive and perhaps a bit psychotic. MiamiDolphins3 19:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And I suppose the Dolphins are above average, which explains why they didn't go the playoffs last year and the Redskins did. It pertains to the man which this article is about, and I see no reason to change it; especially considering he's the only one I know of who does such things.
Furthermore, if you love Miami so much, I don't understand why you'd dislike Miami Hurricane Clinton Portis.JaderVason 23:10, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism by jmfangio[edit]

JMfangio is vandalising this article and removing nonbiased factual information about portis. He is violating wiki policy on revert wars:

"Be respectful to others and their points of view. This means primarily: Do not simply revert changes in a dispute. When someone makes an edit you consider biased or inaccurate, improve the edit, rather than reverting it. Provide a good edit summary when making significant changes that other users might object to. The revision you would prefer will not be established by reverting, and repeated reverting is forbidden; discuss disputed changes on the talk page. If you encounter rude or inappropriate behavior, resist the temptation to respond unkindly, and do not make personal attacks." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtown05 (talk • contribs) 22:56, August 28, 2007 (UTC)

rv see: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/70.143.68.157 Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat  00:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dogfighting controversy[edit]

How is this encyclopedic? An opinion he expressed? Did he commit a crime? Set a record? Get a new job? Violate a rule? Invent something? No, he stated an opinion. Why should an opinion he's stated carry equal weight to his time on an NFL team, as it does on this article? I challenge the notability of this handful of spoken sentences. I understand that it is sourced, but is it 'significant' (word used by The Fat Man Who Never Came Back)?

This has been going back and forth for months. Just because it has made headlines, does not make it notable enough for encyclopedic inclusion. This seems more like coatrack criticism than biographical. By my view, using WP:HARM#TEST, there is undue, harmful weight given to this inclusion. There isn't even a follow-up quote of his clarification and apology... which actually would continue to give this issue more weight.

There's no mention of every injury he's sustained, of every commercial he's been in, his other news-worthy quotes, not even the all records he holds. And that's fine, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. WP:NOT WP:IINFO

This has seemingly escalated into a quasi-edit war. We should reach consensus (WP:CON) if we are to include this, instead of allowing the single active editor (User:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back) to revert the section back in without any discussion - much less reasonable discussion - from either side (the other editor who would include this section was User:Gtown05, who has subsequently been banned for sockpuppetry and edit-warring). Per WP:BLP, I'm removing the contentious section to allow for consensus to be reached. --mc machete 07:42, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot (talk) 18:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Clinton Portis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Clinton Portis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:53, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Clinton_Portis&oldid=1212415850"