Talk:Cole Beasley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cole Beasley. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:33, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cole Beasley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cole Beasley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stance against COVID Vaccination, June 2021[edit]

A non-bias, informative update should be made (by someone more familiar with templates, mores, and formatting than I) regarding the conflict between the NFL's COVID-19 vaccination requirements and rules for non-vaccinated players and Beasley's stance to reject them. Here's the NFL article: https://www.nfl.com/news/bills-wide-receiver-cole-beasley-would-rather-retire-than-get-covid-vaccine Jun 19, 2021 "Bills wide receiver Cole Beasley would rather retire than get COVID vaccine". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.32.132.213 (talk) 03:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is now coverage of this topic. But see WP:RECENTISM, WP:PROPORTION, and WP:ONUS. Regardless of Beasley's views on vaccines, I have removed Category:American anti-vaccination activists, as he is not commonly nor consistently defined as such in reliable sources, per WP:COPDEF and WP:DEFINING. Holding a view does not equate to being an activist, and it is not part of his notability. Not everyone who has ever ridden a bicycle belongs in Category:Cyclists. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:43, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Use of pastteamsnote for Tampa Bay & Buffalo Bills[edit]

Fellow editors, would like a census on the use of pastteamsnote ("Offseason and/or practice squad member only") for Cole Beasley specifically his time with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and his second stint with Buffalo Bills. Per the 2022 NFL season rules, every team can "elevate" an individual practice squad member 3 total games in order for them to play without signing them to an active roster contract (i.e. giving them a 53-man roster spot). Tampa Bay elevated him for two games before he retired. Buffalo in his second stint elevated him for 3 games. Should the pastteamsnote be used for both, either team, or not at all? While my interpretation is it does apply, I think overall it's about being consistent on how that note is used for every NFL player page in Wikipedia. Appreciate the feedback and insight. Diddykong1130 (talk) 05:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]