Talk:DC-UK

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Video games: Sega Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Sega task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Cake Mania (series) (0 participants)
Omocat (4 participants)
Fortnite Chapter 5 Season 2: Myths and Mortals (9 participants)
SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) (9 participants)
Stick Soldiers (2 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (4 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (16 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (15 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Standard Future Publishing magazine running order?[edit]

"At launch, DC-UK changed the standard Future Publishing games magazine running order of news - previews - features - reviews - tips - letters." I have many Future magazines, and other publishers, and they have not always had their content arranged this way. Perhaps this running order might not be associated with Future at all as other publishers had arranged their content this way long before. Nreive 12:59, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I worked at Future Publishing for three years and can confirm that the news - previews - features - reviews - tips - letters running order is, by and large, an accurate reflection of how most of its games magazines were ordered during the time I was there. Liveinpeas 23:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, but what three years were you working there? Future has been publishing since 1985 and has not always had its games magzines in this running order. So you can't say that it was the "standard games magazine running order". -- Nreive 08:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was there, in the videogames department, from 1997 to 2000 Liveinpeas (talk) 12:45, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DC-UK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071023210110/http://www.futureplc.com/future/news/tradenews_story.jsp?type=news&ref=1322&year=2000&month=02 to http://www.futureplc.com/future/news/tradenews_story.jsp?type=news&ref=1322&year=2000&month=02

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]