Talk:Deliveroo

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Transport Low‑importance

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Undue weight[edit]

I believe that the section regarding "Accusations_regarding_employment_conditions" is disproportionately long in violation of WP:UNDUE. While the subject clearly does need to be covered, as it has been reported in reliable sources, the length and manner of presentation makes the article quite unbalanced for the reader. I believe it can and should be reduced to a few sentences. Wikipedia:Criticism#Approaches_to_presenting_criticism is worthy of review here, as is the central guidance that "In most cases separate sections devoted to criticism, controversies, or the like should be avoided in an article because these sections call undue attention to negative viewpoints. "--Jimbo Wales (talk) 12:58, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've reduced the length of the section slightly, though it may still need some work. I also cleaned it up where the phrasing was a bit weird. MereTechnicality (talk) 14:30, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Websterwebfoot (talk) 15:03, 6 September 2019 (UTC)There is a lot of "weird phrasing" in this article. It could use more references and reads like it was written by a disgruntled employee, not an unbiased observer.[reply]

Omission of Orlowski from the lead[edit]

Is there a particular reason why Greg Orlowski is omitted as a co-founder in the article intro? Will Shu's own page calls him a co-founder, not a sole one, so it stands to reason that Orlowski should be mentioned in the lead. ASpacemanFalls (talk) 23:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]