Talk:Demiurge Studios

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Ghosts (Pac-Man) (1 participant)
Midnight.works (1 participant)
Revenge of the Killer Robots from Hell (2 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (3 participants)
International Hobo (1 participant)
Wally Scharold (4 participants)
Cake Mania (series) (1 participant)
Omocat (5 participants)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (17 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Green Day Rock Band[edit]

Maybe this gives some clarity on the rumor. Found on http://www.rockbandaide.com. http://rockbandaide.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/GDRBWii.jpg SkySilver (talk) 21:20, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Intro violates WP:NPOV[edit]

With phrases like "one of the most daring, innovative development teams in the game industry" the intro looks like it violates WP:NPOV. I'd edit myself if I had the time, any takers? ⌘ torpy (talk) 07:26, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate Employee's Number[edit]

The number of employees listed in the sidebar (listed as 51 as I write this) is inaccurate. Perhaps it should be removed so that it doesn't have to be updated constantly. Rushsteve1 (talk) 01:09, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I have changed the employee number to "100+" since that is more accurate, if less precise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rushsteve1 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rushsteve1: Where does this number come from? IceWelder [✉] 07:29, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I got this number from their LinkedIn page

https://www.linkedin.com/company/demiurge-studios

This page states the company as having 101 employees on LinkedIn, and the company size as 50-200 people.

I was unsure if this was a good reference, and the previous number was (to my knowledge) uncited. So I opted to leave this uncited, and make the number imprecise to reflect that. Rushsteve1 (talk) 13:22, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LinkedIn numbers are rarely accurate because they only count LinkedIn profiles that claim to work for the company. This accounts neither for outdated profiles, nor for fabricated ones. It also does not have to be complete as not everyone has LinkedIn. I would rather have accurate old numbers than inaccurate new numbers, but it appears the former number of 51 was neither dated nor sourced. I chose to remove it entirely instead. The Boston.com source from 2008 theoretically has one (24) but a 15-year-old number might really stretch what we can consider useful information. IceWelder [✉] 13:46, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]