Talk:Edward Leigh

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Edward Leigh article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Edward Leigh is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Mitochondrial disease#Management and prevention|mitochondrial replacement therapy]] The anchor (Management and prevention) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled[edit]

Um, vampires and magic? That's got to be vandalism. I'll delete it soon unless it's defended with a cite. LeoO3 06:47, 31 August 2005 (UTC) Well, he is a racist, xenophobe, fascist and mostly likely treasonous swine. Hopefully he is thrown out of the parliament and imprisoned for treason very soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.243.44.132 (talk) 22:59, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, he WAS associated with a crackpot ufologist in connection with a sinister organisation (CPS) which sought to undermine CND by using dubious means. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.217.164 (talk) 20:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"As a prominent Roman Catholic Leigh has sort to portray continental European corporatism (the official socio economic policy of the Vatican)as being compatible with traditional British Conservatism but of course the former is continental, Catholic, corporatist eurofederalist and supranational whereas the party to which he beloings is nationist, Anglican, free enterprise capitalist and Conservative." At best this needs to be rewritten, but I don't see that it adds anything to the article unless there are examples of tensions between European corporatism and British conservatism manifesting themselves in Leigh's career. UmbertoM 00:02 12 January 2007 (UTC)

"...all of his children will be in the line of succession to the British throne around the 600th mark providing they are not catholic". Since, presumably, they are being brought up as Catholics, is this phrase strictly relevant? Widmerpool 06:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leigh line[edit]

This article has recently(?) been linked from numerous articles relating to his distant ancestors or their seat, in the form [[Edward Leigh|Leigh]], as a proxy for the nonexistent Leigh family. Seems not entirely appropriate. Opinions? —Tamfang (talk) 01:05, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think he is related to Hitler, at least he espouses

some of the Hitler's rhetoric. You know apple doesn't fall far from the tree. 90.243.44.132 (talk) 23:03, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

193.82.155.28[edit]

193.82.155.28 has made numerous idiosyncratic edits ...

opposition to abortion → opposition of abortion
- "Opposition of X" sounds to me like a synonym of "opposition by X".

His wife Mary is descended from a sister of King George III, and is thus in the line of succession to the British throne. → removed thus
- Removing thus makes the two facts seem unrelated.

Sir Neville Leigh KCVO → Sir Neville Leigh KCVO
- Linking Sir is overlinking in violation of policy, as well as redundant given the nearby link to Royal Victorian Order. Meanwhile, the late Sir Neville seems a likely candidate for a future article.

An ardent supporter of Margaret Thatcher → An arch supporter of Margaret Thatcher
- arch (adj.) has at least two meanings, and the one intended ought to have a hyphen. Was he indeed one of her principal supporters?

Number 10 Downing Street → Number 10 Downing Street
- Why?! That's just weird.

As such, Leigh was recently offered but rejected the HM Ambassadorship to the Holy See, presumably because it could be just a short-term appointment.
- As what? As President of the Cornerstone Group? It's not obvious how that follows.
- Majesty is irrelevant here; more overlinking.
- Someone please tell me "the HM Ambassadorship" is not standard usage in Westminster...
- We don't presume to read his mind.

thePeerage.com
Debrett's People of Today
- Pointless links to the front pages of these sites, which I've already deleted once on this article and numerous others, inviting links to relevant pages. 193.82.155.28 did replace a third analogous link with a better one.

Also, a bunch of new links will need disambiguating. —Tamfang (talk) 08:04, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As per third point above, Neville Leigh now has his own article. WatermillockCommon (talk) 10:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Edward Leigh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]