Talk:Green Street (film)

Brother in law?

Technically not Matt's brother in law. Pete is Matt's sister's (Shannon) brother in law, but not his brother in law. 68.58.5.119 11:55, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Well, according to the relevant article, the term is commonly used to describe such relationships. SixFourThree (talk) 17:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)SixFourThree

Essay

I have no idea what this article has to do with anything. "latent homosexuality"? What are you talking about? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Limer (talk • contribs) 13:17, 10 November 2005.

I've commented out the obvious essaying for the time being, as per WP:NOT. Mallocks 23:11, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

I removed this entirely, it really has no place in the article. Propound 03:18, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm removing the "Themes" section for the same reason - it's Original Research more than anything. SixFourThree (talk) 17:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)SixFourThree

It is because West Ham is gay. I am Millwall.2600:1012:B062:7363:312D:6BD9:81B7:6AA8 (talk) 22:29, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Accents

I thought the awful quality of Charlie Hunnam's cockney accent was noteable, any time you talk about the film, espeically in West Ham circles, the poor accents are used to discredit the film.

It was in the article last time I read it, but that was quite a while ago. I thought it should go in the response section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Acidulantes (talk • contribs) 22:53, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

"British" football?

This is a film set in London. In London, no-one, apart from a stray Australian, is going to have any doubt what you're talking about. Similarly, reading this article, I don't think anyone will have any doubt that what the word "football" refers to is the round ball game, especially given the other hints in the piece. Removing the descriptor, since it's redundant (although if the film had been called San Siro Hooligans, for example, it would be worth saying that, even though they're in London, they watch Italian football). Wavy (talk) 16:28, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

File:GreenStreetHool.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:GreenStreetHool.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:GreenStreetHool.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

"They win the fight"?

"They win the fight and run away singing "There's your famous GSE!""

I wouldn't say "they win the fight", objectively there's rarely a "winner" in a mass fight. I would say: Attacking the 10 times larger group of surprised Manchester supporters, they managed to keep the fight open for a minute until the police arrived, which "morally" is a win. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.69.58.57 (talk) 13:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Green Street. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051102085057/http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk:80/film/news/article308355.ece to http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/film/news/article308355.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:32, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Page move and rename

I've moved the article back to its previous name. The suffix "hooligans" doens't seem to be the common name for this film, but I'm happy to hear comments about it. Chaheel Riens (talk) 10:14, 6 July 2019 (UTC)