Talk:Grubhub

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Incorrect to rename old article rather than creating a new article for the new company[edit]

This article should not have been renamed GrubHub Seamless - there should have been a new article by that name, to preserve the history of GrubHub. Seamless (company) is still there. Then the intra-Wiki linking would have made sense. If I have time, I'll see what I can do to fix this.Timtempleton (talk) 20:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just a useful source I happened to read, if anyone wants to use it[edit]

New York vs. Grubhub (New York Times). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:10, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Altered wording of assembly bill 5[edit]

the bill 5 lawsuit included irrelevant name-dropping of other plaintiffs in the suit as well as weasel words "and more." The wording of the Assembly Bill 5 section also downplayed the fact that AB5 was passed as a law in California in November of 2019, suggesting somehow "the courts" were still debating it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:130A:FB:31AD:802B:8469:151B (talk) 22:42, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was unsourced. I've removed it. NE Ent 16:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Overview section?[edit]

It seems like the Overview section is unnecessary and redundant, as most of the information is repeated elsewhere in the article, and the lead section already serves as an overview - WP:MOSLEAD. So I propose removing the Overview section, and moving any important info from the Overview section into the lead section instead. Does anyone have any objections? Stonkaments (talk) 04:07, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Easiest to just make the best edits you can, as if someone objects they can improve or revert them. NE Ent 16:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]