Talk:Haptoglobin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

huge edit here guys, spelling still needed. Source is labtestsonline.com, will add source later. HolyMongoose 16:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


It is wrong to consider that haptoglobin binds to free iron. In fact, haptoglobin has no relation with iron, it is transferrin the protein that binds iron and transports it in the blood. Haptoglobin binds to hemoglobin with a high affinity. The complex haptoglobin-hemoglobin is cleared rapidly from the plasma by the liver

Casual research suggests that haptoglobulin refers to either an antibody against Hp or an antigen on the HP molecule to which an antibody would bind. It would be accurate to describe the assay to measure Hp levels as either a "haptoglobin assay" in that it measures Hp levels or a "haptoglobulin assay" because haptoglobulin is the reagent used. I adjusted all references to the blood protein itself to "haptoglobin" rather than "haptoglobulin".NScrutable (talk) 02:59, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography[edit]

Hi. I do not understand why some people added a long list of twenty scientific publications which are not cited in the article. If it where a short selection of a few reviews or landmark papers that would be all right but to get such a long list is not useful for the reader. Any people who would like such a list can simply use PubMed instead. 128.178.197.222 (talk) 15:34, 31 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]

As I have already explained to you here, the intention of the further reading sections in bot generated Gene Wiki articles is to provide notability and encourage human editors to expand the articles by providing background references some of which would hopefully be moved in-line. The closest relevant guideline I could find is this:

Some editors list sources that they hope to use in the future to build the article in Further reading. This is neither encouraged nor prohibited.
— Wikipedia:Further_reading#Relation_to_reference_sections

I myself occasionally remove these further reading sections, especially if there are large numbers of in-line citations. The edits by 128.178.197.222 (talk · contribs) (and by Cite in a footnote if important (talk · contribs), Uno Nano D. Picto (talk · contribs), 128.178.197.56 (talk · contribs), Coreyemotela (talk · contribs), Éffièdaligrh (talk · contribs), Mon3oturf (talk · contribs), Soapamalkanmaime (talk · contribs), and 128.178.197.222 (talk · contribs) which appear to be the same editor based on the similarity of their edits) are borderline. Many of the articles in which the further reading sections have been deleted by these editors have undergone minor expansion and only contain a few in-line citations. Boghog (talk) 16:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Don't you think that the fourteen footnotes are much more useful than the twenty other articles cited? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.85.181.129 (talk) 07:52, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Low hemoglobin, normal reticulocyte[edit]

The case of low hemoglobin with normal reticulocyte levels isn't addressed in the interpretation section. Is this because it never occurs? If so, perhaps that should be noted. Samuel Webster (talk) 14:37, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adipose tissue and role in obesity/inflammation[edit]

doi:10.1210/er.2016-1009 Endocrine Rev JFW | T@lk 12:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Haptoglobin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:56, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]