Talk:Jaleel White

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

jskzjsusiekekeokekdkdk.#}%.\||<|<\#~?

Comment[edit]

He was 4 feet tall "but he has [sic] to shave himself"... ? What does one thing have to do with the other? This article definitely needs some cleaning up, but I don't even know where to begin with that sentence. HEYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!

Jaleel White deceased?[edit]

I just rec'd an email saying that Jaleel shot himself; is this true? If it is why do you not have any information on it?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Cute 1 4 u (talk • contribs)

No, it ishe is 6 Bold text true (thankfully). I don't know what people get out of spreading vicious rumors such as these! Jaleel is very much alive; in fact, he did a recent episode of 24. TamYum 15:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you to whomever added the citation of source to the snopes page.--Geniustwin 00:09, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added the "suicide" rumor to the article, because when I heard that White had killed himself, I checked Wikipedia to see if it was true. I assumed that many others would do the same. The fact that the rumor is widespread, and that there are news sites that report on the rumor itself, makes the rumor newsworthy, I believe. (Remember, Paul is Dead has its own article on Wikipedia!) I'm going to reinstate the "rumor" addition but try to make it more news-like in style. ShawnVW 19:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know where the Long Island, NY high school part of the rumor came from, considering I wrote the letter that appears on snopes and elsewhere. I wrote it on my myspace blog, then posted it on various message boards. Six months later it was everywhere. I did base parts of the fake obit on a rumor I read on an IMDB message board. Why did I write it? To see if it would get on snopes. S davis 03:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]



who watches 24 any way so how would we know?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Cute 1 4 u (talk • contribs)

24 Appearance[edit]

IMDB.com has no record of Jaleel in a 24 episode. And I don't remember seeing him anywhere in the 5th season. Can someone substantiate this?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Cute 1 4 u (talk • contribs)

Hello to everyone. I do not know if you guys and girls have found out that jaleel white is not deceased. I have a valid source. just logg on to bet.com or go to search jaleel white and choose one of the findings. sign pas_69

Automall commercial?[edit]

Over here in NJ there's a very Urkel-esque character appearing in commericials for an automall. I don't think it's him, but can anyone in NJ verify? 69.125.89.103 02:50, 21 September 2006 (UTC) (aka marikun)[reply]

Jaleel White Deceased ? (April 20, 2007)[edit]

Why does it say Jaleel White died on April 20, 2007? I have been googling for the past twenty minutes and I have found nothing on this. Cite your sources please. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.50.173.46 (talk) 04:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Typical vandalism. When you see it, revert it. Novalis 23:38, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ADD or ADHD[edit]

Do you think that he has ADHD??? I just want to know??? Thanks

Pop Star?[edit]

I remember Jaleel White having an R+b album and a short lived attempt to become a pop artist. Someone less lazy than I am should add that to the article. 72.78.163.154 20:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I can't find any evidence of it online. If you have some and can overcome your laziness, please add it with a source. 71.238.189.104 (talk) 04:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I specifically remember watching this, possibly during high-school health class. He had a song called "Contents Under Pressure" that was pro-abstinence. It seems to be on youtube, but I'm at work now and can't watch it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.93.60.42 (talk) 12:29, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Probs vandalism[edit]

I'm pretty sure Jaleel White did not die in 3010, so I removed that part.Shinealight 14:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"The Adventures of Charizard the Dragon" 1991 series[edit]

Was this an actual show? I'm pretty sure someone put that there as a joke. I can't find any other reference to it anywhere else. I'm going to delete it (even though I got a chuckle out of it).Snackmagic 20:29, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MMA fight?[edit]

Just lik most of the other hearsay thats been posted on this discussion page there a popular rumor going arounf that mr white is training and planning to fight in MMA I highly doubt it to be true but Secretly I kind of hope it is, Anyone else hear this one or have any links? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.169.12.125 (talk) 05:03, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Las Vegas or Pasadena?[edit]

Which city was he born in? The article lists Pasadena in the infobox, but Las Vegas in the article.Anoldtreeok (talk) 05:21, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, looked at the source for Las Vegas and realised it also said Pasadena, will edit it now. Anoldtreeok (talk) 05:21, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on VH1[edit]

Unfortunately this entry is semi-protected until June, but something should be added about White's infamous comment about "putting a bullet in his head" if caught doing the Urkel character again, as it changes how the article depicts how he felt about Urkel. White's exact words recently on TV...

"There's a quote, that I wish I could take back...that says 'If you ever see me playing this character again, put a bullet in my head.' When I said that, I didn't think it would be taken out of context with the internet and the future. But I loved that character. That character honestly exists in my heart."

--Source: VH1's 100 Greatest Kid Stars "Hour 5" - 12/2/2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by MondayNgt (talk • contribs) 01:53, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - But not with that specific source or quote. Pinkadelica♣ 05:49, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jaleel White. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:51, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI edit request[edit]

Hi all! I'm here on behalf of Mr. White with a small COI edit request: removing the "partner" parameter from the infobox. The Template:Infobox person documentation says this should be used for an "unmarried long-term partner" and "If particularly relevant, or if the partner is notable". I didn't find any further discussion in the template's talk archives. The examples I've found (e.g. Mary-Louise Parker, Garry Shandling, Oprah Winfrey) use the parameter in cases where the relationship was 1) much longer than three years and 2) with a person who is independently notable. Because neither is true in this case, and lacking any more specific guideline about whether the parameter is appropriate here, I'm wondering if the mention of Ms. Hardy in the "Personal life" section of the article body is sufficient.

Due to my COI, I won't be editing the article directly. I appreciate any help or feedback. Thanks! Mary Gaulke (talk) 21:46, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 28-JUL-2019[edit]

  1. The first item to consider is the relevance of the individual's position in the life of the subject and how the noted references refer to the individual. This individual is the mother of the subject's child; however, the subject and Ms Hardy have become estranged, and the level of prominence here was never as solid (only 3 year time span) as it is in cases where the placement is well established (Oprah Winfrey, for example). Using the |partner(s)= parameter is problematic in that this specific term is not uniformly used in the noted sources — which vicariously describe Ms. Hardy as White's "girlfriend" or the "mother of his child" — but not necessarily his life partner.[a]
  2. The second item to consider is whether this parameter and how it is used might harm the reputation of the subject. The relevant guideline is WP:BLPCAT, which states:

    Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case for each content category must be made clear by the article text and its reliable sources. Categories regarding religious beliefs (or lack of such) or sexual orientation should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief (or lack of such) or orientation in question, and the subject's beliefs or sexual orientation are relevant to their public life or notability, according to reliable published sources .... These principles apply equally to lists, navigation templates, and Infobox statements (referring to living persons within any Wikipedia page) that are based on religious beliefs (or lack of such) or sexual orientation or suggest that any living person has a poor reputation.

    The individual Ms. Hardy has made accusations against the subject which impugn his character and have generally described White as a person with a poor reputation. Describing the individual who has made these accusations as Mr. White's "partner", by placing them under the |partner(s)= parameter, might imbue those accusations with a certain level of veracity which they might not ordinarily receive.
  3. The third item to consider is the subject's wishes. An infobox statement of |religion=Jewish would be inappropriate in an article on an atheist, especially if the subject themself did not agree to it.[b] Here the issue may be similar, in that the title of "partner" may not be one that the subject agrees to in hindsight as accurately describing their time together. Like the infobox's |party= parameter, the |partner(s)= parameter describes an intimate part of the subject's life and personal being to which their input should be greatly considered. Since the |partner(s)= parameter does not confer the same legal validity as |spouse= does, the subject's input on the status of this parameter should carry more weight than it would otherwise. Simply put, since Ms. Hardy doesn't have a marriage license, the subject is allowed more leeway in defining on his own terms what their relationship ultimately was, because Ms. Hardy doesn't have the legal documentation to define it for the both of them.[c]

I believe that these three reasons lend weight to removing the |partner(s)= parameter from the infobox. Pinging @Crboyer: for their input (and my apologies in advance for the ping if you are already watchlisted for this page). Regards,  Spintendo  14:12, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

  1. ^ WP:BLPCAT states that "the case for each content category must be made clear by the article text and its reliable sources." WP:BLPCAT guidelines apply equally to infoboxes and their parameter statements.
  2. ^ Use of the |religion= parameter is currently deprecated, although it's use guidelines still apply in areas where a possibility for defamation exists — the |partner(s)= parameter being one of them.
  3. ^ If Ms. Hardy had her own Wikipedia article, it would be in that article's infobox where she could define the relationship in her own terms (in accordance with the provided sources) — meaning she should have as much input into whether or not the relationship was listed as a partnership in her own article, as Mr. White should in his.
  • The Partner parameter, as defined by [Template:Infobox person], was "unmarried long-term partner." I thought girlfriend and mother of child, counted. But you've made a convincing case why that doesn't apply here. Delete it or not, I'll support whatever decision. Crboyer (talk) 04:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Regards,  Spintendo  16:02, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Second Name[edit]

Why he have a arabic name ( Ahmad) ? Are his family muslims or arabs ? Avestaboy (talk) 18:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic[edit]

Give you a call if I 2600:1700:8960:70E0:C5E6:84D9:F01F:A8B4 (talk) 15:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jaleel_White&oldid=1207977351"