Talk:Lo Mejor de Mí (song)

Lo Mejor de Mí (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 17, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Latin music Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lo Mejor de Mí (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 07:27, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments (apologies for the delay)

Is Juan Ramon notable?
- Well he had two songs that ranked on the Latin Songs in the US. Don't know if that helps.
  - If this makes him notable enough for an article then I suggest he's, at the least, red-linked. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:54, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"The song speaks of a failed relationship where the protagonist gave the best they could in spite of not meeting the lover's expectations" not great, can we copyedit this? Is it the singer himself who is the protagonist? Should it be "their lover's"?
- Yes, the singer is the protagonist.
  - That still needs copyediting, it's not making much sense. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:54, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Consider linking "covered" appropriately.
- Done
First line of background is strikingly similar to the first line of the lead, can we have some more imagination...
- Are you addressing this? The Rambling Man (talk) 07:54, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As does the second line...
- Are you addressing this? The Rambling Man (talk)
"Musically, the song is performed under the style of bolero music" reads poorly, "musically ... music"? You mean "The song is performed in the bolero style"?
- Done
"reached number-one on" not sure that needs to be hyphenated.
- Done
"Year-end charts" table, the "Chart (1998)" heading shouldn't sort.
- And fixed it to have two seperate tables
Ref 15, 16 etc, be consistent with linking of publisher, billboard etc.
- Removed overlinking (aside from templates)
Ref 18 compared with the others, don't mix access date or publication date styles.
- What was I thinking? I clearly need to pay attention more often.

I'll put this on hold for the time being. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:42, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I'll take care of the remaining issues as well soon. Erick (talk) 21:49, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How does it look now? Erick (talk) 16:37, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lo Mejor de Mí (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130615051809/http://wvw.nacion.com/viva/1998/abril/03/espec9.html to http://wvw.nacion.com/viva/1998/abril/03/espec9.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:31, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]