Talk:London Olympians

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New Construction[edit]

Having noted the underconstruction tag and the recent edits, I wonder what the goal is. So far the article appears not to have been improved by the added information. A list of non-notable players for what is essentially an amateur sports club doesn't seem to have a great deal of merit for instance. MLA 14:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't like the list of 'mediocre' players (which is bassicaly what you're calling them, even though they have won endlessly), then just tell me, before you get rid of it. But i'm just trying to formalise the article with images and an infobox (created by the styles of the French). Pafcool2 17:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I raised this for discussion here rather than just intervene myself as I'm happy to discuss the merits of inclusion. Article's already looking better than when I first saw the underconstruction link. I'm not calling the players mediocre - I'm using a wikipedia technical term - non-notable ie none of these guys are ever likely to have their own articles so a list of them is a list of non-notable people even if they're a really good amateur gridiron team. MLA 10:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the information concerning special teams coach scott Rowe, as this information is outdated. Scott Rowe coached for the kent Exiles last season and is doing so again this season. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.13.93.97 (talk) 11:42, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updated the page including what division the team are in, the list of coaches and removed the roster due to it being out of date and there being no updated roster available to refer to. 81.100.6.127 (talk) 21:18, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]