Talk:Los Saicos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Opinion[edit]

The article is full of opinion, and totally devoid of reliable sources. It should be the other way round. Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 15:48, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is actually pretty good. It could certainly be improved, and it would definitely be better with some footnoted references, but it doesn't seem to be as POV laden as the previous comment suggests. I've added some links to official websites and also a link to an article from The Guardian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.168.241.222 (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

this article begins with a sentence fragment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.249.244.241 (talk) 06:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have now made major changes to the text and format of the article. In addition to being much better sourced, the article is now significantly more neutral and encyclopedic in tone, as well as way more accurate and informative. I have removed unsourced statements that were either spurious or unnecessary and added helpful sourced details. There are still a few places that need to have citations/sources inserted. However, to my best judgment, everything now said here is accurate and verifiable. Garagepunk66 (talk) 23:11, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Los Saicos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]