Talk:Magic Bullet (appliance)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Infomercial (again)[edit]

Judging by this talk page and its archive, the infomercial is clearly central to this product, as witnessed by Google results: "The Magic Bullet" blender infomercial. Most of these search results are of course from blogs, consumer advice sites, satirical sites, etc, and not from what Wikipedia calls "reliable sources". This is unsurprising given the genre and nature of the infomercial.

The article's lead mentions "television advertisements and infomercials and sold […] under the 'As seen on TV' banner." Under these circumstances, I find the recent removal of the whole section "Infomercial" with the edit summary "Removing wholly unneeded section regarding infomercial (no reliable source to support that the product is known for its infomercial)" difficult to understand. Calling it "unneeded" sounds a bit like WP:IDONTLIKEIT/Wikipedia:I just don't like it.

I understand that before matters of the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources have to be addressed, Wikipedia:Verifiability needs to be considered first. However, "this policy requires that anything challenged or likely to be challenged […] be attributed to a reliable source." In this context, the essay Wikipedia:These are not original research#Works of fiction says: "Anything that can be observed by a reasonable person simply by reading the work itself, without interpretation, is not original research."

The article's lead already establishes the importance of the infomercial; removing a section on that subject does not seem to benefit readers. I suggest to restore the section "Infomercial" (although I would welcome slimming it a bit). -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 08:44, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Magic Bullet (appliance). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]